Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda
Uganda: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 71.43 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda is 71.43, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Uganda ranks 53rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 71.43 | — |
| 2014 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 71.43 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 52 United States of America 77.14 compare
- 53 Pakistan 71.43 compare
- 53 Japan 71.43 compare
- 53 Argentina 71.43 compare
- 53 Belarus 71.43 compare
- 53 Bosnia and Herzegovina 71.43 compare
- 53 Botswana 71.43 compare
- 53 Colombia 71.43 compare
- 53 Croatia 71.43 compare
- 53 Estonia 71.43 compare
- 53 Hong Kong, China 71.43 compare
- 53 Hungary 71.43 compare
- 53 Jamaica 71.43 compare
- 53 Kenya 71.43 compare
- 53 Mauritius 71.43 compare
- 53 Netherlands 71.43 compare
- 53 New Zealand 71.43 compare
- 53 Panama 71.43 compare
- 53 Peru 71.43 compare
- 53 Puerto Rico 71.43 compare
- 53 Romania 71.43 compare
- 53 Singapore 71.43 compare
- 53 Slovenia 71.43 compare
- 53 South Africa 71.43 compare
- 53 Sri Lanka 71.43 compare
- 53 Switzerland 71.43 compare
- 53 Tunisia 71.43 compare
- 53 United Arab Emirates 71.43 compare
- 53 Viet Nam 71.43 compare
More reference data data for Uganda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.29 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Uganda was 71.43 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 71.43 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 71.43 in 2013.
- How does Uganda rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Uganda ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.