Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi

Malawi: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 57.14 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
57.14
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
82nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
57.14
in 2013
All-time low
57.14
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi, 2013–2019

02040602013201620192013: 57.12014: 57.12015: 57.12016: 57.12017: 57.12018: 57.12019: 57.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi is 57.14, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Malawi 82nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 57.14
2014 57.14 +0.0%
2015 57.14 +0.0%
2016 57.14 +0.0%
2017 57.14 +0.0%
2018 57.14 +0.0%
2019 57.14 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Malawi

  1. 82 Bahrain 57.14 compare
  2. 82 Barbados 57.14 compare
  3. 82 Czechia 57.14 compare
  4. 82 Guyana 57.14 compare
  5. 82 Nepal 57.14 compare
  6. 82 Philippines 57.14 compare
  7. 82 Slovakia 57.14 compare
  8. 82 Syria 57.14 compare
  9. 82 Tanzania 57.14 compare
  10. 82 Zambia 57.14 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Malawi

All data for Malawi →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi?
Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi was 57.14 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Malawi?
The highest recorded value was 57.14 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Malawi?
The lowest recorded value was 57.14 in 2013.
How does Malawi rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
Malawi ranks 82nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Malawi?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Malawi data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/malawi/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Malawi</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.