Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania

Lithuania: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 100 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
100
in 2018
All-time low
57.14
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania, 2013–2019

0204060801002013201620192013: 57.12014: 57.12015: 71.42016: 71.42017: 85.72018: 1002019: 100

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 100 for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

The figure is up 75.0% over ten years.

Lithuania ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 57.14
2014 57.14 +0.0%
2015 71.43 +25.0%
2016 71.43 +0.0%
2017 85.71 +20.0%
2018 100 +16.7%
2019 100 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 1 Indonesia 100 compare
  2. 1 Australia 100 compare
  3. 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
  4. 1 Cyprus 100 compare
  5. 1 France 100 compare
  6. 1 Italy 100 compare
  7. 1 Kuwait 100 compare
  8. 1 Mongolia 100 compare
  9. 1 Norway 100 compare
  10. 1 Saudi Arabia 100 compare
  11. 1 Taiwan 100 compare
  12. 1 Ukraine 100 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania?
Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 100 in 2018.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 57.14 in 2013.
How does Lithuania rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
Lithuania ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/lithuania/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.