Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji

Fiji: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 42.86 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
42.86
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
93rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
42.86
in 2016
All-time low
14.29
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji, 2013–2019

102030402013201620192013: 14.32014: 14.32015: 14.32016: 42.92017: 42.92018: 42.92019: 42.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Fiji recorded 42.86 for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of up 200.0% over ten years.

Fiji ranks 93rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Fiji, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 14.29
2014 14.29 +0.0%
2015 14.29 +0.0%
2016 42.86 +200.0%
2017 42.86 +0.0%
2018 42.86 +0.0%
2019 42.86 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Fiji

  1. 93 Bangladesh 42.86 compare
  2. 93 Mexico 42.86 compare
  3. 93 Bahamas 42.86 compare
  4. 93 Bhutan 42.86 compare
  5. 93 El Salvador 42.86 compare
  6. 93 Ghana 42.86 compare
  7. 93 Lebanon 42.86 compare
  8. 93 Oman 42.86 compare
  9. 93 Papua New Guinea 42.86 compare
  10. 93 Qatar 42.86 compare
  11. 93 Zimbabwe 42.86 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Fiji

All data for Fiji →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji?
Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji was 42.86 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Fiji?
The highest recorded value was 42.86 in 2016.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Fiji?
The lowest recorded value was 14.29 in 2013.
How does Fiji rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
Fiji ranks 93rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Fiji?
Over the last ten years it is up 200.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Fiji data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/fiji/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Fiji</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.