Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador

Ecuador: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 14.29 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
14.29
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
123rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
14.29
in 2013
All-time low
14.29
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador, 2013–2019

0510152013201620192013: 14.32014: 14.32015: 14.32016: 14.32017: 14.32018: 14.32019: 14.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador is 14.29, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Ecuador ranks 123rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Ecuador, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 14.29
2014 14.29 +0.0%
2015 14.29 +0.0%
2016 14.29 +0.0%
2017 14.29 +0.0%
2018 14.29 +0.0%
2019 14.29 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 123 Costa Rica 14.29 compare
  2. 123 Grenada 14.29 compare
  3. 123 Guatemala 14.29 compare
  4. 123 Iraq 14.29 compare
  5. 123 Sudan 14.29 compare
  6. 123 Suriname 14.29 compare
  7. 123 Venezuela 14.29 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador?
Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador was 14.29 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 14.29 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 14.29 in 2013.
How does Ecuador rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
Ecuador ranks 123rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-corporate-transparency-index-0-7-db15-20-2/ecuador/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.