Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index was 28.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of is 28.57, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 105th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 28.57 | — |
| 2014 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 28.57 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- 105 Antigua and Barbuda 28.57 compare
- 105 Benin 28.57 compare
- 105 Burkina Faso 28.57 compare
- 105 Chile 28.57 compare
- 105 Côte d'Ivoire 28.57 compare
- 105 Dominica 28.57 compare
- 105 Guinea-Bissau 28.57 compare
- 105 Iran, Islamic Republic of 28.57 compare
- 105 Mali 28.57 compare
- 105 Niger 28.57 compare
- 105 Senegal 28.57 compare
- 105 Saint Kitts and Nevis 28.57 compare
- 105 Saint Lucia 28.57 compare
- 105 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 28.57 compare
- 105 Togo 28.57 compare
- 105 Trinidad and Tobago 28.57 compare
- 105 Palestine, State of 28.57 compare
More reference data data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7329 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3892 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 28.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 28.57 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 28.57 in 2013.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 105th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of corporate transparency index rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.