Statizoid

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
6 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 191 countries
All-time high
6 DB15-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau, 2013–2019

02462013201620192013: 5 DB15-20 methodology2014: 6 DB15-20 methodology2015: 6 DB15-20 methodology2016: 6 DB15-20 methodology2017: 6 DB15-20 methodology2018: 6 DB15-20 methodology2019: 6 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Guinea-Bissau recorded 6 DB15-20 methodology for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 20.0% over ten years.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 96th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2013 5 DB15-20 methodology —
2014 6 DB15-20 methodology +20.0%
2015 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 6 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau

  1. 96 Pakistan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 96 Angola 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 96 Argentina 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 96 Bhutan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 96 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 96 Cape Verde 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 96 Cameroon 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 96 Croatia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 96 Ecuador 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 96 Estonia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 96 Eswatini 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 96 France 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 96 Honduras 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 96 Italy 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 96 Liberia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 96 Montenegro 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 96 Namibia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 96 Netherlands 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 96 Nicaragua 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 96 Paraguay 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 96 Peru 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 96 Senegal 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 96 Sierra Leone 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 96 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 96 Sudan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 96 Suriname 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 96 Tajikistan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 96 Türkiye 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 96 Ukraine 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 96 Palestine, State of 6 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau

All data for Guinea-Bissau →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau?
Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
The lowest recorded value was 5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
How does Guinea-Bissau rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 96th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db15-20-methodology/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db15-20-methodology/guinea-bissau/">Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Guinea-Bissau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence and recover legal expenses. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit. Alternatively, whether they can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (ii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iii) whether the plaintiff can obtain cate­gories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (iv) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial; (v) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases; and (vi) whether shareholder plaintiffs can recover their legal expenses from the company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.