Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 80 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands stood at 80. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
That places Marshall Islands 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 80 | — |
| 2014 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 80 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 24 Japan 80 compare
- 24 Antigua and Barbuda 80 compare
- 24 Armenia 80 compare
- 24 Australia 80 compare
- 24 Azerbaijan 80 compare
- 24 Bahamas 80 compare
- 24 Belarus 80 compare
- 24 Brunei 80 compare
- 24 Bulgaria 80 compare
- 24 Colombia 80 compare
- 24 Costa Rica 80 compare
- 24 Denmark 80 compare
- 24 Dominica 80 compare
- 24 Dominican Republic 80 compare
- 24 Finland 80 compare
- 24 Grenada 80 compare
- 24 Guyana 80 compare
- 24 Iceland 80 compare
- 24 Kiribati 80 compare
- 24 South Korea 80 compare
- 24 Kyrgyzstan 80 compare
- 24 Malaysia 80 compare
- 24 Maldives 80 compare
- 24 Malta 80 compare
- 24 Micronesia (country) 80 compare
- 24 Moldova 80 compare
- 24 Mongolia 80 compare
- 24 Norway 80 compare
- 24 Panama 80 compare
- 24 Puerto Rico 80 compare
- 24 San Marino 80 compare
- 24 Slovenia 80 compare
- 24 South Africa 80 compare
- 24 Saint Kitts and Nevis 80 compare
- 24 Saint Lucia 80 compare
- 24 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 80 compare
- 24 Tanzania 80 compare
- 24 Trinidad and Tobago 80 compare
- 24 United Kingdom 80 compare
- 24 Uruguay 80 compare
More reference data data for Marshall Islands
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 0 (2019)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Democracy 7 (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Marshall Islands was 80 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 80 in 2013.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2013.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 24th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.