Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo
Congo: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 50 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo, 2013–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo stood at 50. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
The figure is up 25.0% over ten years.
Congo ranks 128th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 40 | — |
| 2014 | 50 | +25.0% |
| 2015 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 50 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 50 | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 128 China 50 compare
- 128 Mexico 50 compare
- 128 Algeria 50 compare
- 128 Bahrain 50 compare
- 128 Benin 50 compare
- 128 Bosnia and Herzegovina 50 compare
- 128 Burkina Faso 50 compare
- 128 Central African Republic 50 compare
- 128 Comoros 50 compare
- 128 Cote d'Ivoire 50 compare
- 128 Equatorial Guinea 50 compare
- 128 Eritrea 50 compare
- 128 Gambia 50 compare
- 128 Germany 50 compare
- 128 Greece 50 compare
- 128 Guatemala 50 compare
- 128 Guinea 50 compare
- 128 Iraq 50 compare
- 128 Jamaica 50 compare
- 128 Kosovo 50 compare
- 128 Lebanon 50 compare
- 128 Madagascar 50 compare
- 128 Mali 50 compare
- 128 Niger 50 compare
- 128 North Macedonia 50 compare
- 128 Romania 50 compare
- 128 Rwanda 50 compare
- 128 Serbia 50 compare
- 128 Seychelles 50 compare
- 128 South Sudan 50 compare
- 128 Switzerland 50 compare
- 128 East Timor 50 compare
- 128 Togo 50 compare
- 128 Tunisia 50 compare
- 128 Vanuatu 50 compare
- 128 Zimbabwe 50 compare
- 128 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 50 compare
More reference data data for Congo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0199 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1866 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0031 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0668 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0724 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9126 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.017 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Congo was 50 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 50 in 2014.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2013.
- How does Congo rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Congo ranks 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.