Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany

Germany: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
5 DB06-14 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
112th
of 191 countries
All-time high
5 DB06-14 methodology
in 2005
All-time low
5 DB06-14 methodology
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany, 2005–2013

0123452005200920132005: 5 DB06-14 methodology2006: 5 DB06-14 methodology2007: 5 DB06-14 methodology2008: 5 DB06-14 methodology2009: 5 DB06-14 methodology2010: 5 DB06-14 methodology2011: 5 DB06-14 methodology2012: 5 DB06-14 methodology2013: 5 DB06-14 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany stood at 5 DB06-14 methodology. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany peaked at 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 5 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.

That places Germany 112th out of 191 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) in Germany, 2005 to 2013.
Year DB06-14 methodology Change
2005 5 DB06-14 methodology
2006 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2007 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2008 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2009 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2010 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2011 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2012 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%
2013 5 DB06-14 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 5 DB06-14 methodology 5 DB06-14 methodology 5 DB06-14 methodology 5
2010s 5 DB06-14 methodology 5 DB06-14 methodology 5 DB06-14 methodology 4

Countries ranked near Germany

  1. 112 Nigeria 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  2. 112 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  3. 112 Central African Republic 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  4. 112 Croatia 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  5. 112 Eritrea 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  6. 112 France 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  7. 112 Gambia 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  8. 112 Greece 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  9. 112 Guatemala 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  10. 112 Guinea-Bissau 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  11. 112 Lebanon 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  12. 112 Madagascar 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  13. 112 Malawi 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  14. 112 Mauritania 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  15. 112 Seychelles 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  16. 112 Spain 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  17. 112 Suriname 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  18. 112 Vanuatu 5 DB06-14 methodology compare
  19. 112 Palestine 5 DB06-14 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Germany

All data for Germany →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany?
Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany was 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Germany?
The highest recorded value was 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Germany?
The lowest recorded value was 5 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
How does Germany rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Germany ranks 112th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Germany?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Germany data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology/germany/">Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Germany</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)
Unit
DB06-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain cate­gories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.