Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark
Denmark: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 7 DB06-14 methodology in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-14 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark is 7 DB06-14 methodology, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark peaked at 7 DB06-14 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 7 DB06-14 methodology, in 2005.
Denmark ranks 44th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark, year by year
| Year | DB06-14 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 7 DB06-14 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 7 DB06-14 methodology | 4 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 44 Pakistan 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Albania 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Antigua and Barbuda 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Australia 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Bahamas 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Belgium 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Bulgaria 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Dominica 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Dominican Republic 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Fiji 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Finland 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Georgia 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Ghana 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Grenada 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Hungary 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Iceland 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Kazakhstan 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Kiribati 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 South Korea 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Moldova 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Mozambique 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Norway 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Portugal 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Slovakia 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Sri Lanka 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Saint Kitts and Nevis 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Saint Lucia 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Sweden 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Thailand 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Trinidad and Tobago 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 United Kingdom 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
- 44 Zambia 7 DB06-14 methodology compare
More reference data data for Denmark
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1915 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4109 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Denmark was 7 DB06-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 7 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 7 DB06-14 methodology in 2005.
- How does Denmark rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- Denmark ranks 44th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.