Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino
San Marino: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 80 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino is 80, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino peaked at 80 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 80, in 2005.
San Marino ranks 12th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 80 | — |
| 2006 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 80 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 80 | 5 |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 80 | 4 |
Countries ranked near San Marino
- 11 United States of America 86 compare
- 12 Bangladesh 80 compare
- 12 India 80 compare
- 12 Japan 80 compare
- 12 Armenia 80 compare
- 12 Azerbaijan 80 compare
- 12 Belarus 80 compare
- 12 Brunei Darussalam 80 compare
- 12 Colombia 80 compare
- 12 Czechia 80 compare
- 12 Guyana 80 compare
- 12 Israel 80 compare
- 12 Kyrgyzstan 80 compare
- 12 Lesotho 80 compare
- 12 Malaysia 80 compare
- 12 Maldives 80 compare
- 12 Malta 80 compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 80 compare
- 12 Micronesia, Federated States of 80 compare
- 12 Mongolia 80 compare
- 12 Palau 80 compare
- 12 Panama 80 compare
- 12 Papua New Guinea 80 compare
- 12 Philippines 80 compare
- 12 Puerto Rico 80 compare
- 12 Samoa 80 compare
- 12 Slovenia 80 compare
- 12 Solomon Islands 80 compare
- 12 South Africa 80 compare
- 12 Tanzania, United Republic of 80 compare
- 12 Tonga 80 compare
- 12 Uruguay 80 compare
More reference data data for San Marino
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 0.8488 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 0.8488 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 0.8488 (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Democracy 7 (2025)
- Free country 2 (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 1 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Elected parliament 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino?
- Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in San Marino was 80 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in San Marino?
- The highest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in San Marino?
- The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
- How does San Marino rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
- San Marino ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in San Marino?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this San Marino data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.