Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal

Nepal: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 90 in 2013. ▬ Flat

Latest (2013)
90
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
5th
of 191 countries
All-time high
90
in 2005
All-time low
90
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal, 2005–2013

0204060801002005200920132005: 902006: 902007: 902008: 902009: 902010: 902011: 902012: 902013: 90

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal stood at 90. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal peaked at 90 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 90, in 2005.

Nepal ranks 5th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Nepal, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 90
2006 90 +0.0%
2007 90 +0.0%
2008 90 +0.0%
2009 90 +0.0%
2010 90 +0.0%
2011 90 +0.0%
2012 90 +0.0%
2013 90 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 90 90 90 5
2010s 90 90 90 4

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 5 Canada 90 compare
  2. 5 Ireland 90 compare
  3. 5 Latvia 90 compare
  4. 5 Poland 90 compare
  5. 5 Singapore 90 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal?
Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal was 90 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
How does Nepal rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Nepal ranks 5th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology-2/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology-2/nepal/">Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.