Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya

Kenya: Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) was 100 in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
100
in 2007
All-time low
90
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya, 2005–2013

0204060801002005200920132005: 902006: 902007: 1002008: 1002009: 1002010: 1002011: 1002012: 1002013: 100

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2013, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya stood at 100. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of up 11.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya peaked at 100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 90, in 2005.

Kenya ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Kenya, 2005 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2005 90
2006 90 +0.0%
2007 100 +11.1%
2008 100 +0.0%
2009 100 +0.0%
2010 100 +0.0%
2011 100 +0.0%
2012 100 +0.0%
2013 100 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 96 90 100 5
2010s 100 100 100 4

Countries ranked near Kenya

  1. 1 Hong Kong 100 compare
  2. 1 Mauritius 100 compare
  3. 1 New Zealand 100 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kenya

All data for Kenya →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya?
Protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya was 100 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Kenya?
The highest recorded value was 100 in 2007.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) recorded in Kenya?
The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
How does Kenya rank for protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10)?
Kenya ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
Is protecting minority investors: ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) rising or falling in Kenya?
Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kenya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology-2/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-ease-of-shareholder-suits-index-0-10-db06-14-methodology-2/kenya/">Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) in Kenya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.