Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines

Philippines: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 60 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
60
Change on year
up 36.4%
World rank
72nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
60
in 2019
All-time low
40
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines, 2013–2019

02040602013201620192013: 402014: 402015: 402016: 402017: 402018: 442019: 60

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Philippines is 60, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

The figure is up 36.4% on the previous year and up 50.0% over ten years.

Philippines ranks 72nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 40 —
2014 40 +0.0%
2015 40 +0.0%
2016 40 +0.0%
2017 40 +0.0%
2018 44 +10.0%
2019 60 +36.4%

Philippines compared with similar countries

  • Philippines's 60 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Philippines's 60 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 54, 1.1× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Philippines

  1. 72 Bangladesh 60 compare
  2. 72 Russia 60 compare
  3. 72 Botswana 60 compare
  4. 72 Ghana 60 compare
  5. 72 Papua New Guinea 60 compare
  6. 72 Zambia 60 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Philippines

All data for Philippines →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Philippines?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Philippines was 60 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Philippines?
The highest recorded value was 60 in 2019.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Philippines?
The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2013.
How does Philippines rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Philippines ranks 72nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Philippines?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Philippines data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/philippines/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Philippines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.