Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia

North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 82 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
82
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
12th
of 191 countries
All-time high
82
in 2016
All-time low
68
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia, 2013–2019

0204060802013201620192013: 682014: 702015: 762016: 822017: 822018: 822019: 82

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in North Macedonia is 82, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

That represents a change of up 20.6% over ten years.

That places North Macedonia 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 68 —
2014 70 +2.9%
2015 76 +8.6%
2016 82 +7.9%
2017 82 +0.0%
2018 82 +0.0%
2019 82 +0.0%

North Macedonia compared with similar countries

  • North Macedonia's 82 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57, 1.4× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • North Macedonia's 82 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 68, 1.2× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near North Macedonia

  1. 13 India 80 compare
  2. 13 Colombia 80 compare
  3. 13 Ireland 80 compare
  4. 13 South Africa 80 compare
  5. 13 United Arab Emirates 80 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for North Macedonia

All data for North Macedonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in North Macedonia?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in North Macedonia was 82 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in North Macedonia?
The highest recorded value was 82 in 2016.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in North Macedonia?
The lowest recorded value was 68 in 2013.
How does North Macedonia rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in North Macedonia?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/north-macedonia/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in North Macedonia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.