Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania

Lithuania: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 70 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
70
Change on year
up 2.9%
World rank
37th
of 191 countries
All-time high
70
in 2019
All-time low
60
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania, 2013–2019

0204060802013201620192013: 602014: 602015: 642016: 642017: 662018: 682019: 70

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 70 for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.9% on the previous year and up 16.7% over ten years.

That places Lithuania 37th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 60 —
2014 60 +0.0%
2015 64 +6.7%
2016 64 +0.0%
2017 66 +3.1%
2018 68 +3.0%
2019 70 +2.9%

Lithuania compared with similar countries

  • Lithuania's 70 is above the median for high income countries, which is 66, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Lithuania's 70 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 68, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 36 United States 71.6 compare
  2. 37 Indonesia 70 compare
  3. 37 Austria 70 compare
  4. 37 Croatia 70 compare
  5. 37 Greece 70 compare
  6. 37 Morocco 70 compare
  7. 37 Serbia 70 compare
  8. 37 Uzbekistan 70 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Lithuania?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Lithuania was 70 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 70 in 2019.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 60 in 2013.
How does Lithuania rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Lithuania ranks 37th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/lithuania/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.