Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini

Eswatini: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 26 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
26
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
163rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
26
in 2013
All-time low
26
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini, 2013–2019

01020302013201620192013: 262014: 262015: 262016: 262017: 262018: 262019: 26

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Eswatini stood at 26. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Eswatini 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 26 —
2014 26 +0.0%
2015 26 +0.0%
2016 26 +0.0%
2017 26 +0.0%
2018 26 +0.0%
2019 26 +0.0%

Eswatini compared with similar countries

  • Eswatini's 26 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 42, 62% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Eswatini's 26 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 34, 76% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Eswatini

  1. 163 Central African Republic 26 compare
  2. 163 Comoros 26 compare
  3. 163 Congo 26 compare
  4. 163 Equatorial Guinea 26 compare
  5. 163 Guinea 26 compare
  6. 163 San Marino 26 compare
  7. 163 Yemen 26 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Eswatini

All data for Eswatini →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Eswatini?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Eswatini was 26 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Eswatini?
The highest recorded value was 26 in 2013.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Eswatini?
The lowest recorded value was 26 in 2013.
How does Eswatini rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Eswatini ranks 163rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Eswatini?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/eswatini/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Eswatini</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.