Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score was 36 in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
36
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
141st
of 191 countries
All-time high
36
in 2018
All-time low
10
in 2013
Years of data
7
2013–2019

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, 2013–2019

102030402013201620192013: 102014: 102015: 102016: 102017: 102018: 362019: 36

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan is 36, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 260.0% over ten years.

That places Afghanistan 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan, 2013 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2013 10 —
2014 10 +0.0%
2015 10 +0.0%
2016 10 +0.0%
2017 10 +0.0%
2018 36 +260.0%
2019 36 +0.0%

Afghanistan compared with similar countries

  • Afghanistan's 36 is above the median for low income countries, which is 33, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Afghanistan's 36 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 54, 67% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 141 El Salvador 36 compare
  2. 141 Madagascar 36 compare
  3. 144 Burundi 34 compare
  4. 144 Dominican Republic 34 compare
  5. 144 Paraguay 34 compare
  6. 144 Seychelles 34 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan?
Protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score in Afghanistan was 36 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was 36 in 2018.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was 10 in 2013.
How does Afghanistan rank for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Afghanistan ranks 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is up 260.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/">Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score in Afghanistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,337 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.