Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Romania
Romania: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 56.67 in 2013. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Romania, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Romania recorded 56.67 for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Romania peaked at 56.67 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 53.33, in 2005.
Romania ranks 67th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Romania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 53.33 | — |
| 2006 | 56.67 | +6.3% |
| 2007 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 56.67 | +0.0% |
Romania compared with similar countries
- Romania's 56.67 is above the median for high income countries, which is 56.67, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Romania's 56.67 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 60, 94% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56 | 53.33 | 56.67 | 5 |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 56.67 | 56.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Romania
- 67 Mexico 56.67 compare
- 67 Australia 56.67 compare
- 67 Brunei 56.67 compare
- 67 Burundi 56.67 compare
- 67 Estonia 56.67 compare
- 67 Fiji 56.67 compare
- 67 Finland 56.67 compare
- 67 Italy 56.67 compare
- 67 Lithuania 56.67 compare
- 67 Madagascar 56.67 compare
- 67 Malta 56.67 compare
- 67 Paraguay 56.67 compare
- 67 Seychelles 56.67 compare
- 67 Tunisia 56.67 compare
- 67 Zambia 56.67 compare
More reference data data for Romania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.689 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 21.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.75 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Romania?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Romania was 56.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 56.67 in 2006.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 53.33 in 2005.
- How does Romania rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Romania ranks 67th out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.