Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia
Serbia: Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural was 98.21 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Latest (2014)
98.21
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
10th
of 113 countries
All-time high
98.21
in 2006
All-time low
98.21
in 2006
Years of data
9
2006–2014
Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia, 2006–2014
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia is 98.21, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia peaked at 98.21 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 98.21, in 2006.
That places Serbia 10th out of 113 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.
Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 98.21 | — |
| 2007 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 98.21 | +0.0% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 98.21 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 93.04, 1.1× the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 98.21 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 97.69, 1.0× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.21 | 98.21 | 98.21 | 4 |
| 2010s | 98.21 | 98.21 | 98.21 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 98.6 compare
- 8 Mexico 98.52 compare
- 9 China 98.3
- 11 Iraq 97.6 compare
- 12 Kyrgyzstan 97.17 compare
- 13 Maldives 97.08
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia?
- Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural in Serbia was 98.21 in 2014, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 98.21 in 2006.
- What is the lowest proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 98.21 in 2006.
- How does Serbia rank for proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural?
- Serbia ranks 10th out of 113 countries with data for 2014.
- Is proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Proportion with basic handwashing facilities urban vs rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).