Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus
Belarus: Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) was 4.4% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus, 2002–2020
Source: Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO). Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2020, proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus stood at 4.4%. That is the highest value across all 19 years on record.
That represents a change of up 22.8% on the previous year and up 73.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus peaked at 4.4% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 1.9%, in 2011.
That places Belarus 34th out of 78 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 3.4% | — |
| 2003 | 3.1% | -10.2% |
| 2004 | 3.0% | -1.9% |
| 2005 | 2.1% | -29.1% |
| 2006 | 2.8% | +30.4% |
| 2007 | 2.2% | -21.5% |
| 2008 | 2.4% | +10.0% |
| 2009 | 2.6% | +7.1% |
| 2010 | 2.5% | -2.3% |
| 2011 | 1.9% | -23.0% |
| 2012 | 3.0% | +52.6% |
| 2013 | 3.2% | +9.5% |
| 2014 | 2.7% | -16.4% |
| 2015 | 3.5% | +28.0% |
| 2016 | 4.0% | +16.1% |
| 2017 | 3.8% | -6.7% |
| 2018 | 4.0% | +7.2% |
| 2019 | 3.6% | -11.7% |
| 2020 | 4.4% | +22.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7% | 2.1% | 3.4% | 8 |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 1.9% | 4.0% | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 31 Côte d'Ivoire 4.7% compare
- 32 Republic of Moldova 4.5% compare
- 33 Ukraine 4.5% compare
- 34 Iran, Islamic Republic of 4.4% compare
- 36 Senegal 4.2% compare
- 37 Viet Nam 4.2% compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus?
- Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) in Belarus was 4.4% in 2020, according to Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO).
- What is the highest proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 4.4% in 2020.
- What is the lowest proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.9% in 2011.
- How does Belarus rank for proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing)?
- Belarus ranks 34th out of 78 countries with data for 2020.
- Is proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 73.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Universal Health Coverage Dataset, World Health Organization (WHO), published as part of Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) out-of-pocket health expenditure (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Proportion of population spending more than 40% but less than 100% of household discretionary budget on out-of-pocket health expenditure (%) The discretionary budget is defined as the total household budget, measured by consumption expenditure or income, minus the societal poverty line (SPL). Using 2017 purchasing power parities (PPPs), the SPL corresponds to whichever is greater: $2.15 (the international poverty line) or $1.15 + 50% of median household consumption expenditure or income, excluding out-of-pocket household expenditure on health. Out-of-pocket health expenditure is defined as any spending incurred by a household when any member uses a health good or service to receive any type of care (preventive, curative, rehabilitative, long-term or palliative care); provided by any type of provider; for any type of disease, illness or health condition; in any type of setting (outpatient, inpatient, at home).