Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tunisia
Tunisia: Political Stability - Governance estimate was -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tunisia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, political stability - governance estimate in Tunisia stood at -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
The figure is down 19.2% on the previous year and down 53.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Tunisia peaked at 0.2634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2024.
That places Tunisia 172nd out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.1381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.1611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.6% |
| 2000 | 0.233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +44.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0705 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -69.7% |
| 2003 | 0.2634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +273.4% |
| 2004 | -0.0348 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -113.2% |
| 2005 | -0.0901 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +158.8% |
| 2006 | -0.0234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -74.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -140.7% |
| 2008 | -0.1121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1276.5% |
| 2009 | -0.1206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.5% |
| 2010 | -0.2557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +112.1% |
| 2011 | -0.3781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +47.9% |
| 2012 | -0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +78.2% |
| 2013 | -0.892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.4% |
| 2014 | -0.6013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.6% |
| 2015 | -0.6812 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.3% |
| 2016 | -0.8276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.5% |
| 2017 | -0.7433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.2% |
| 2018 | -0.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.7% |
| 2019 | -0.5614 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2020 | -0.4326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.9% |
| 2021 | -0.6669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +54.2% |
| 2022 | -0.7396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.9% |
| 2023 | -0.776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2024 | -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.2% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | -1276.5% | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.0217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.6174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Tunisia?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Tunisia was -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9248 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- How does Tunisia rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Tunisia ranks 172nd out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 53.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.