Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for political stability - governance estimate in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 96.0% on the previous year and up 97.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan peaked at -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.4445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.4745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.7% |
| 2000 | -0.5959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.6% |
| 2002 | -0.7723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.6% |
| 2003 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.5% |
| 2004 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2005 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.6% |
| 2006 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2007 | -0.8797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.5% |
| 2008 | -0.5421 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.4% |
| 2009 | -0.6046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.5% |
| 2010 | -0.9358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +54.8% |
| 2011 | -0.9823 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.0% |
| 2012 | -0.8746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2013 | -0.8315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.9% |
| 2014 | -0.717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.8% |
| 2015 | -0.7467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2016 | -0.5549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.7% |
| 2017 | -0.3195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -42.4% |
| 2018 | -0.3425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2019 | -0.2288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.2% |
| 2020 | -0.5367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +134.6% |
| 2021 | -0.4132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.0% |
| 2022 | -0.4483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.5% |
| 2023 | -0.4695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.7% |
| 2024 | -0.3961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.6% |
| 2025 | -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -96.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.4762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.4445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.8966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5421 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.6534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9823 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.3799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan was -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 97.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.