Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Costa Rica, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for political stability - governance estimate in 2025.
That represents a change of down 3.2% on the previous year and up 62.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Costa Rica peaked at 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0.5851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2008.
That places Costa Rica 24th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.7651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.8828 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.4% |
| 2000 | 0.7068 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.9% |
| 2002 | 0.9394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.9% |
| 2003 | 0.6312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.8% |
| 2004 | 0.7189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.9% |
| 2005 | 0.8404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.9% |
| 2006 | 0.8843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2007 | 0.8231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.9% |
| 2008 | 0.5851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.9% |
| 2009 | 0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.2% |
| 2010 | 0.7929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.0% |
| 2011 | 0.6136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.6% |
| 2012 | 0.6518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2013 | 0.6642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.6865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 0.7537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2016 | 0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2017 | 0.7482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2018 | 0.6464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2019 | 0.6386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 0.9372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +46.8% |
| 2021 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.0% |
| 2022 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.7% |
| 2023 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.7% |
| 2024 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2025 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.8176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.5× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.3652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3.3× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8828 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.6925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 21 Kiribati 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 22 Grenada 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 23 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 25 Nauru 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 26 Antigua and Barbuda 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 27 Luxembourg 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Costa Rica?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Costa Rica was 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008.
- How does Costa Rica rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Costa Rica ranks 24th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 62.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.