Political Stability - Governance estimate in Belarus
Belarus: Political Stability - Governance estimate was -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Belarus, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for political stability - governance estimate in Belarus is -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 3.9% on the previous year and down 379.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability - governance estimate in Belarus peaked at 0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, -0.8183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2020.
That places Belarus 137th out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Political Stability - Governance estimate in Belarus, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.0988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.2178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +120.5% |
| 2000 | 0.2638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.1% |
| 2002 | 0.3396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.7% |
| 2003 | 0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +113.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -97.7% |
| 2005 | 0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1917.2% |
| 2006 | 0.179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -47.1% |
| 2007 | 0.3236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +80.8% |
| 2008 | 0.4437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.1% |
| 2009 | 0.3534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.4% |
| 2010 | -0.0853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -124.1% |
| 2011 | -0.0818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -104.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +388.4% |
| 2014 | 0.135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +662.6% |
| 2015 | 0.1165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.7% |
| 2016 | 0.2028 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +74.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -86.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2677 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +908.1% |
| 2019 | 0.4258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +59.1% |
| 2020 | -0.8183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -292.2% |
| 2021 | -0.6164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.7% |
| 2022 | -0.6169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | -0.3926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.4% |
| 2024 | -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.7× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.3087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Political Stability - Governance estimate in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +1917.2% | 0.0168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2018 | +908.1% | 0.0266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2677 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2014 | +662.6% | 0.0177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0168 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5643 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability - governance estimate in Belarus?
- Political stability - governance estimate in Belarus was -0.3773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- What is the lowest political stability - governance estimate recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.8183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
- How does Belarus rank for political stability - governance estimate?
- Belarus ranks 137th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is political stability - governance estimate rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 379.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.