Centralization of Political Power Index in Serbia
Serbia: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.55 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Serbia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for centralization of political power index in Serbia is 0.55, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 2.2% on the previous year and up 53.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Serbia peaked at 0.943 in 1942 and was at its lowest, 0.247, in 2008.
Serbia ranks 66th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.925 | — |
| 1790 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.925 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.931 | +0.6% |
| 1805 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.931 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.925 | -0.6% |
| 1815 | 0.929 | +0.4% |
| 1816 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.929 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.905 | -2.6% |
| 1836 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.855 | -5.5% |
| 1843 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.855 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.829 | -3.0% |
| 1859 | 0.843 | +1.7% |
| 1860 | 0.86 | +2.0% |
| 1861 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.86 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.836 | -2.8% |
| 1865 | 0.863 | +3.2% |
| 1866 | 0.863 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.863 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.863 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.8 | -7.3% |
| 1870 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.8 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.808 | +1.0% |
| 1887 | 0.808 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.793 | -1.9% |
| 1889 | 0.752 | -5.2% |
| 1890 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.792 | +5.3% |
| 1896 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.792 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.779 | -1.6% |
| 1903 | 0.757 | -2.8% |
| 1904 | 0.758 | +0.1% |
| 1905 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.758 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.76 | +0.3% |
| 1917 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.757 | -0.4% |
| 1919 | 0.682 | -9.9% |
| 1920 | 0.682 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.687 | +0.7% |
| 1922 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.687 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.707 | +2.9% |
| 1929 | 0.711 | +0.6% |
| 1930 | 0.873 | +22.8% |
| 1931 | 0.872 | -0.1% |
| 1932 | 0.796 | -8.7% |
| 1933 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.796 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.78 | -2.0% |
| 1940 | 0.795 | +1.9% |
| 1941 | 0.893 | +12.3% |
| 1942 | 0.943 | +5.6% |
| 1943 | 0.902 | -4.3% |
| 1944 | 0.902 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.806 | -10.6% |
| 1946 | 0.762 | -5.5% |
| 1947 | 0.763 | +0.1% |
| 1948 | 0.763 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.763 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.76 | -0.4% |
| 1951 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.76 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.667 | -12.2% |
| 1964 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.667 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.649 | -2.7% |
| 1975 | 0.647 | -0.3% |
| 1976 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.647 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.649 | +0.3% |
| 1980 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.649 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.701 | +8.0% |
| 1990 | 0.672 | -4.1% |
| 1991 | 0.756 | +12.5% |
| 1992 | 0.745 | -1.5% |
| 1993 | 0.644 | -13.6% |
| 1994 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.458 | -28.9% |
| 2001 | 0.278 | -39.3% |
| 2002 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.262 | -5.8% |
| 2004 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.259 | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.253 | -2.3% |
| 2008 | 0.247 | -2.4% |
| 2009 | 0.247 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.258 | +4.5% |
| 2011 | 0.258 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.267 | +3.5% |
| 2013 | 0.344 | +28.8% |
| 2014 | 0.353 | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 0.359 | +1.7% |
| 2016 | 0.39 | +8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.437 | +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.397 | -9.2% |
| 2019 | 0.443 | +11.6% |
| 2020 | 0.503 | +13.5% |
| 2021 | 0.482 | -4.2% |
| 2022 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.525 | +8.9% |
| 2024 | 0.538 | +2.5% |
| 2025 | 0.55 | +2.2% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 0.55 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.3495, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 0.55 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1585, 3.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.925 | 0.925 | 0.925 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.9286 | 0.925 | 0.931 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.9294 | 0.925 | 0.931 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.929 | 0.929 | 0.929 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.917 | 0.905 | 0.929 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.865 | 0.855 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.8512 | 0.829 | 0.855 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.8528 | 0.8 | 0.863 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.7961 | 0.752 | 0.808 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.772 | 0.752 | 0.792 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.7668 | 0.757 | 0.792 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.7507 | 0.682 | 0.76 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.6909 | 0.682 | 0.711 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.8097 | 0.78 | 0.873 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.8292 | 0.762 | 0.943 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.6949 | 0.667 | 0.76 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.6554 | 0.647 | 0.667 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6542 | 0.649 | 0.701 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6681 | 0.644 | 0.756 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2806 | 0.247 | 0.458 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3506 | 0.258 | 0.443 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5133 | 0.482 | 0.55 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Serbia?
- Centralization of political power index in Serbia was 0.55 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.943 in 1942.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.247 in 2008.
- How does Serbia rank for centralization of political power index?
- Serbia ranks 66th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.