Centralization of Political Power Index in Haiti
Haiti: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.809 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Haiti, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for centralization of political power index in Haiti is 0.809, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and up 14.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Haiti peaked at 0.964 in 1957 and was at its lowest, 0.569, in 1996.
Haiti ranks 32nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Haiti, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.949 | — |
| 1790 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.949 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.908 | -4.3% |
| 1817 | 0.913 | +0.6% |
| 1818 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.913 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.951 | +4.2% |
| 1845 | 0.951 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.937 | -1.5% |
| 1847 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.895 | -4.5% |
| 1891 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.898 | +0.3% |
| 1905 | 0.898 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.898 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.898 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.898 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.898 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.897 | -0.1% |
| 1911 | 0.902 | +0.6% |
| 1912 | 0.902 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.902 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.902 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.905 | +0.3% |
| 1916 | 0.899 | -0.7% |
| 1917 | 0.899 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.937 | +4.2% |
| 1919 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.937 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.936 | -0.1% |
| 1922 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.936 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.929 | -0.7% |
| 1931 | 0.893 | -3.9% |
| 1932 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.893 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.889 | -0.4% |
| 1935 | 0.865 | -2.7% |
| 1936 | 0.883 | +2.1% |
| 1937 | 0.875 | -0.9% |
| 1938 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.884 | +1.0% |
| 1943 | 0.884 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.883 | -0.1% |
| 1945 | 0.883 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.867 | -1.8% |
| 1947 | 0.867 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.867 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.867 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.913 | +5.3% |
| 1951 | 0.875 | -4.2% |
| 1952 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.934 | +6.7% |
| 1957 | 0.964 | +3.2% |
| 1958 | 0.96 | -0.4% |
| 1959 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.96 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.955 | -0.5% |
| 1972 | 0.954 | -0.1% |
| 1973 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.954 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.957 | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.833 | -13.0% |
| 1988 | 0.83 | -0.4% |
| 1989 | 0.886 | +6.7% |
| 1990 | 0.862 | -2.7% |
| 1991 | 0.771 | -10.6% |
| 1992 | 0.895 | +16.1% |
| 1993 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.866 | -3.2% |
| 1995 | 0.594 | -31.4% |
| 1996 | 0.569 | -4.2% |
| 1997 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.569 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.576 | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 0.589 | +2.3% |
| 2002 | 0.583 | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.746 | +28.0% |
| 2005 | 0.831 | +11.4% |
| 2006 | 0.738 | -11.2% |
| 2007 | 0.572 | -22.5% |
| 2008 | 0.572 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.576 | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 0.694 | +20.5% |
| 2011 | 0.696 | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.673 | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0.689 | +2.4% |
| 2014 | 0.689 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.707 | +2.6% |
| 2016 | 0.705 | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.684 | -3.0% |
| 2018 | 0.671 | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 0.696 | +3.7% |
| 2020 | 0.681 | -2.2% |
| 2021 | 0.72 | +5.7% |
| 2022 | 0.747 | +3.8% |
| 2023 | 0.804 | +7.6% |
| 2024 | 0.795 | -1.1% |
| 2025 | 0.809 | +1.8% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 0.809 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.5475, 1.5× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 0.809 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.236, 3.4× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.949 | 0.949 | 0.949 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.949 | 0.949 | 0.949 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.949 | 0.949 | 0.949 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.9341 | 0.908 | 0.949 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.913 | 0.913 | 0.913 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.913 | 0.913 | 0.913 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.9302 | 0.913 | 0.951 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.937 | 0.937 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.937 | 0.937 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.937 | 0.937 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.937 | 0.937 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.895 | 0.895 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.8968 | 0.895 | 0.898 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.9082 | 0.897 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.9361 | 0.936 | 0.937 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.887 | 0.865 | 0.929 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.8752 | 0.867 | 0.884 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.9106 | 0.875 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.9547 | 0.954 | 0.96 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.923 | 0.83 | 0.957 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7159 | 0.569 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6366 | 0.572 | 0.831 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6904 | 0.671 | 0.707 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7593 | 0.681 | 0.809 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 29 Iran 0.834 compare
- 29 Kazakhstan 0.834 compare
- 31 Mauritania 0.826 compare
- 33 Algeria 0.806 compare
- 34 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.801 compare
- 35 Central African Republic 0.8 compare
More reference data data for Haiti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2934 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6522 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2643 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Haiti?
- Centralization of political power index in Haiti was 0.809 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 0.964 in 1957.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.569 in 1996.
- How does Haiti rank for centralization of political power index?
- Haiti ranks 32nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.