PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 by country
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 553 but lower than or equal to 626 on the PISA reading scale. At Level 4, readers can comprehend extended passages in single or multiple-text settings. They interpret the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text...
What the numbers show
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 is currently reported for 55 countries. The highest value is 22.2% in Liechtenstein; the lowest is 0.0% in Indonesia.
The median across all reporting countries is 8.0%, and the mean is 7.2%.
Over the past decade 26 countries rose and 15 fell. The largest increase was in Peru (up 200.0%), and the largest decrease in Tunisia (down 100.0%).
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4: full country ranking
| # | Country | Latest | Year | 10-year change | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liechtenstein | 22.2% | 2012 | down 16.5% | flat |
| 2 | Macao | 12.0% | 2018 | up 100.0% | rising |
| 2 | South Korea | 12.0% | 2018 | down 20.0% | falling |
| 2 | Hong Kong | 12.0% | 2018 | down 20.0% | falling |
| 5 | Canada | 11.0% | 2018 | down 8.3% | falling |
| 5 | Ireland | 11.0% | 2018 | up 22.2% | flat |
| 5 | Germany | 11.0% | 2018 | up 10.0% | rising |
| 5 | Finland | 11.0% | 2018 | down 8.3% | falling |
| 5 | Estonia | 11.0% | 2018 | up 37.5% | rising |
| 10 | United States | 10.0% | 2018 | unchanged | rising |
| 10 | Poland | 10.0% | 2018 | up 25.0% | rising |
| 10 | New Zealand | 10.0% | 2018 | unchanged | falling |
| 10 | Sweden | 10.0% | 2018 | up 25.0% | falling |
| 10 | Japan | 10.0% | 2018 | down 16.7% | flat |
| 10 | United Kingdom | 10.0% | 2018 | up 25.0% | flat |
| 10 | Spain | 10.0% | 2015 | up 100.0% | rising |
| 17 | Norway | 9.0% | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 17 | Switzerland | 9.0% | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 17 | Belgium | 9.0% | 2018 | down 18.2% | falling |
| 17 | Australia | 9.0% | 2018 | down 10.0% | falling |
| 17 | Portugal | 9.0% | 2018 | up 12.5% | rising |
| 17 | Denmark | 9.0% | 2018 | up 12.5% | flat |
| 17 | France | 9.0% | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 24 | Czechia | 8.0% | 2018 | up 33.3% | flat |
| 24 | Austria | 8.0% | 2018 | up 14.3% | falling |
| 24 | Netherlands | 8.0% | 2018 | down 20.0% | falling |
| 24 | Slovenia | 8.0% | 2018 | up 14.3% | rising |
| 24 | Italy | 8.0% | 2018 | unchanged | rising |
| 29 | Lithuania | 7.0% | 2018 | up 75.0% | rising |
| 29 | Russia | 7.0% | 2018 | up 75.0% | rising |
| 29 | Latvia | 7.0% | 2018 | up 40.0% | rising |
| 29 | Luxembourg | 7.0% | 2018 | unchanged | rising |
| 29 | Israel | 7.0% | 2018 | unchanged | rising |
| 29 | Iceland | 7.0% | 2018 | down 22.2% | falling |
| 29 | Hungary | 7.0% | 2018 | down 22.2% | falling |
| 29 | Croatia | 7.0% | 2018 | up 16.7% | rising |
| 37 | Turkey | 6.0% | 2018 | up 50.0% | rising |
| 38 | Chile | 5.0% | 2018 | up 25.0% | rising |
| 38 | Greece | 5.0% | 2018 | down 28.6% | falling |
| 38 | Slovakia | 5.0% | 2018 | down 16.7% | falling |
| 41 | Uruguay | 4.0% | 2018 | up 33.3% | falling |
| 42 | Brazil | 3.0% | 2018 | up 50.0% | rising |
| 42 | Bulgaria | 3.0% | 2018 | down 25.0% | rising |
| 42 | Colombia | 3.0% | 2018 | up 50.0% | rising |
| 42 | Peru | 3.0% | 2018 | up 200.0% | volatile |
| 42 | Qatar | 3.0% | 2018 | up 50.0% | rising |
| 42 | Romania | 3.0% | 2018 | up 50.0% | rising |
| 48 | Argentina | 2.0% | 2018 | unchanged | falling |
| 48 | Montenegro | 2.0% | 2018 | up 100.0% | rising |
| 48 | Mexico | 2.0% | 2018 | unchanged | falling |
| 51 | Thailand | 1.0% | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 51 | Jordan | 1.0% | 2018 | unchanged | flat |
| 51 | Albania | 1.0% | 2018 | unchanged | volatile |
| 54 | Tunisia | 0.0% | 2015 | down 100.0% | falling |
| 54 | Indonesia | 0.0% | 2018 | — | volatile |
Regions and income groups
Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.
- OECD members 8.0%
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 553 but lower than or equal to 626 on the PISA reading scale. At Level 4, readers can comprehend extended passages in single or multiple-text settings. They interpret the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text as a whole. In other interpretative tasks, students demonstrate understanding and application of ad hoc categories. They can compare perspectives and draw inferences based on multiple sources. Readers can search, locate and integrate several pieces of embedded information in the presence of plausible distractors. They can generate inferences based on the task statement in order to assess the relevance of target information. They can handle tasks that require them to memories prior task context. In addition, students at this level can evaluate the relationship between specific statements and a person’s overall stance or conclusion about a topic. They can reflect on the strategies that authors use to convey their points, based on salient features of texts (e.g., titles and illustrations). They can compare and contrast claims explicitly made in several texts and assess the reliability of a source based on salient criteria. Texts at Level 4 are often long or complex, and their content or form may not be standard. Many of the tasks are situated in multiple-text settings. The texts and the tasks contain indirect or implicit cues. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5). PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 4 data have been included in this database as Level 4 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/