PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Lithuania
Lithuania: PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 was 14.0% in 2018. ▼ Falling
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Lithuania, 2006–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
The most recent figure for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Lithuania is 14.0%, measured in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of down 17.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Lithuania peaked at 17.0% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 14.0%, in 2015.
That places Lithuania 3rd out of 55 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 15.0% | 17.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 14.0% | 15.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 1 Liechtenstein 24.4% compare
- 2 Turkey 15.0% compare
- 3 Chile 14.0% compare
- 3 Croatia 14.0% compare
- 3 Greece 14.0% compare
- 3 Italy 14.0% compare
- 3 Jordan 14.0% compare
- 3 Latvia 14.0% compare
- 3 Mexico 14.0% compare
- 3 Montenegro 14.0% compare
- 3 Romania 14.0% compare
- 3 Russia 14.0% compare
- 3 Slovenia 14.0% compare
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Lithuania?
- Pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Lithuania was 14.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 17.0% in 2009.
- What is the lowest pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.0% in 2015.
- How does Lithuania rank for pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Lithuania ranks 3rd out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Male 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/