PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Brazil
Brazil: PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 was 13.0% in 2018. ▼ Falling
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Brazil, 2000–2018
Source: OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
Analysis
The most recent figure for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Brazil is 13.0%, measured in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 7 years on record.
That represents a change of down 7.1% on the previous year and down 18.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Brazil peaked at 17.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 13.0%, in 2018.
Brazil ranks 18th of 55 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2 in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 16.0% | — |
| 2003 | 15.0% | -6.2% |
| 2006 | 15.0% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 16.0% | +6.7% |
| 2012 | 17.0% | +6.2% |
| 2015 | 14.0% | -17.6% |
| 2018 | 13.0% | -7.1% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 13.0% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 15.0%, 87% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 13.0% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 15.0%, 87% of the median. (7 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.5% | 15.0% | 16.0% | 4 |
| 2010s | 14.7% | 13.0% | 17.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Brazil?
- Pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 in Brazil was 13.0% in 2018, according to OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).
- What is the highest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 17.0% in 2012.
- What is the lowest pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.0% in 2018.
- How does Brazil rank for pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2?
- Brazil ranks 18th out of 55 countries with data for 2018.
- Is pisa: female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). level 2 rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), published as part of PISA: Female 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of 15-year-old female students scoring higher than 407 but lower than or equal to 480 on the PISA reading scale. Readers at Level 2 can identify the main idea in a piece of text of moderate length. They can understand relationships or construe meaning within a limited part of the text when the information is not prominent by producing basic inferences, and/or when the text(s) include some distracting information. They can select and access a page in a set based on explicit though sometimes complex prompts, and locate one or more pieces of information based on multiple, partly implicit criteria. Readers at Level 2 can, when explicitly cued, reflect on the overall purpose, or on the purpose of specific details, in texts of moderate length. They can reflect on simple visual or typographical features. They can compare claims and evaluate the reasons supporting them based on short, explicit statements. Tasks at Level 2 may involve comparisons or contrasts based on a single feature in the text. Typical reflective tasks at this level require readers to make a comparison or several connections between the text and outside knowledge by drawing on personal experience and attitudes. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5) than later assessments. PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 2 data have been included in this database as Level 2 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/