PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 553 but lower than or equal to 626 on the PISA reading scale. At Level 4, readers can comprehend extended passages in single or multiple-text settings. They interpret the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text as a...

Countries reporting
52
Highest
27.0%
Hong Kong
Lowest
1.0%
Tunisia
Median
18.0%
Years covered
19
2000–2018
Data points
349

What the numbers show

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4 is currently reported for 52 countries. The highest value is 27.0% in Hong Kong; the lowest is 1.0% in Tunisia.

The median across all reporting countries is 18.0%, and the mean is 15.7%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 27.

Over the past decade 22 countries rose and 20 fell. The largest increase was in Spain (up 69.2%), and the largest decrease in Tunisia (down 66.7%).

PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Hong Kong 27.0% 2018 down 15.6% flat
2 Macao 26.0% 2018 up 52.9% rising
4 Finland 25.0% 2018 down 19.4% falling
4 South Korea 25.0% 2018 down 24.2% falling
6 Canada 24.0% 2018 down 11.1% falling
6 Estonia 24.0% 2018 up 14.3% rising
9 Poland 23.0% 2018 up 4.5% rising
9 New Zealand 23.0% 2018 down 8.0% falling
11 Japan 22.0% 2018 down 18.5% falling
11 Norway 22.0% 2018 unchanged flat
11 Denmark 22.0% 2018 up 4.8% flat
11 Spain 22.0% 2015 up 69.2% rising
11 Sweden 22.0% 2018 up 10.0% falling
16 United Kingdom 21.0% 2018 up 5.0% falling
16 United States 21.0% 2018 unchanged flat
16 Australia 21.0% 2018 down 12.5% falling
16 Germany 21.0% 2018 down 8.7% rising
16 Portugal 21.0% 2018 up 5.0% rising
21 France 20.0% 2018 down 9.1% falling
21 Belgium 20.0% 2018 down 20.0% falling
21 Slovenia 20.0% 2018 up 5.3% flat
24 Netherlands 19.0% 2018 down 20.8% falling
24 Czechia 19.0% 2018 up 11.8% flat
24 Austria 19.0% 2018 up 11.8% falling
24 Switzerland 19.0% 2018 down 17.4% falling
28 Hungary 18.0% 2018 down 18.2% flat
28 Israel 18.0% 2018 unchanged rising
30 Italy 17.0% 2018 down 15.0% flat
30 Latvia 17.0% 2018 unchanged rising
30 Lithuania 17.0% 2018 up 21.4% rising
30 Iceland 17.0% 2018 down 22.7% falling
34 Russia 16.0% 2018 up 45.5% rising
34 Croatia 16.0% 2018 unchanged flat
37 Slovakia 14.0% 2018 down 17.6% falling
38 Turkey 13.0% 2018 up 8.3% rising
38 Greece 13.0% 2018 down 27.8% falling
40 Chile 12.0% 2018 up 33.3% rising
41 Romania 9.0% 2018 up 50.0% rising
42 Bulgaria 8.0% 2018 down 27.3% rising
42 Uruguay 8.0% 2018 unchanged falling
44 Qatar 7.0% 2018 up 40.0% rising
44 Brazil 7.0% 2018 up 16.7% rising
46 Colombia 6.0% 2018 up 20.0% rising
46 Montenegro 6.0% 2018 up 20.0% rising
48 Peru 5.0% 2018 up 66.7% rising
48 Mexico 5.0% 2018 unchanged falling
48 Argentina 5.0% 2018 down 16.7% falling
51 Jordan 4.0% 2018 up 33.3% rising
52 Thailand 3.0% 2018 unchanged falling
52 Albania 3.0% 2018 unchanged rising
54 Indonesia 1.0% 2018 unchanged volatile
54 Tunisia 1.0% 2015 down 66.7% falling

About this data

Indicator
PISA: 15-year-olds by reading proficiency level (%). Level 4
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 349 data points, 2000–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old students scoring higher than 553 but lower than or equal to 626 on the PISA reading scale. At Level 4, readers can comprehend extended passages in single or multiple-text settings. They interpret the meaning of nuances of language in a section of text by taking into account the text as a whole. In other interpretative tasks, students demonstrate understanding and application of ad hoc categories. They can compare perspectives and draw inferences based on multiple sources. Readers can search, locate and integrate several pieces of embedded information in the presence of plausible distractors. They can generate inferences based on the task statement in order to assess the relevance of target information. They can handle tasks that require them to memories prior task context. In addition, students at this level can evaluate the relationship between specific statements and a person’s overall stance or conclusion about a topic. They can reflect on the strategies that authors use to convey their points, based on salient features of texts (e.g., titles and illustrations). They can compare and contrast claims explicitly made in several texts and assess the reliability of a source based on salient criteria. Texts at Level 4 are often long or complex, and their content or form may not be standard. Many of the tasks are situated in multiple-text settings. The texts and the tasks contain indirect or implicit cues. 2000, 2003, and 2006 PISA assessments used a different reading proficiency scale (Levels 1 to 5). PISA 2000/2003/2006 Level 4 data have been included in this database as Level 4 because they are based on an identical score range. Use caution in comparing proficiency scores across years. For more information on comparability of results, consult the PISA website: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/