Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Suriname
Suriname: Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score was 97.5% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Suriname, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Suriname is 97.5%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Suriname peaked at 97.5% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 97.5%, in 2005.
That places Suriname 39th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score in Suriname, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 97.5% | — |
| 2006 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 97.5% | +0.0% |
Suriname compared with similar countries
- Suriname's 97.5% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 86.4%, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Suriname's 97.5% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 81.7%, 1.2× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.5% | 97.5% | 97.5% | 5 |
| 2010s | 97.5% | 97.5% | 97.5% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
More reference data data for Suriname
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0324 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0374 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1239 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0109 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1239 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1088 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0507 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2131 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6104 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Suriname?
- Paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score in Suriname was 97.5% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 97.5% in 2005.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 97.5% in 2005.
- How does Suriname rank for paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score?
- Suriname ranks 39th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - score rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Total tax and contribution rate (% of profit) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for total tax and contribution rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.