Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore

Singapore: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score was 97.68 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
97.68
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
12th
of 191 countries
All-time high
100
in 2005
All-time low
94.36
in 2009
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore, 2005–2019

0204060801002005201220192005: 1002006: 1002007: 1002008: 94.62009: 94.42010: 94.42011: 94.42012: 94.72013: 94.72014: 94.72015: 94.72016: 97.32017: 97.72018: 97.72019: 97.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Singapore recorded 97.68 for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in 2019.

The figure is up 3.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Singapore peaked at 100 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 94.36, in 2009.

Singapore ranks 12th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore, year by year

Annual values for Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 100 —
2006 100 +0.0%
2007 100 +0.0%
2008 94.59 -5.4%
2009 94.36 -0.2%
2010 94.36 +0.0%
2011 94.36 +0.0%
2012 94.67 +0.3%
2013 94.67 +0.0%
2014 94.67 +0.0%
2015 94.67 +0.0%
2016 97.3 +2.8%
2017 97.68 +0.4%
2018 97.68 +0.0%
2019 97.68 +0.0%

Singapore compared with similar countries

  • Singapore's 97.68 is above the median for high income countries, which is 85.7, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Singapore's 97.68 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 81.38, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 97.79 94.36 100 5
2010s 95.77 94.36 97.68 10

Countries ranked near Singapore

  1. 9 Luxembourg 99.07 compare
  2. 10 Marshall Islands 98.92 compare
  3. 11 Switzerland 97.84 compare
  4. 13 Oman 97.06 compare
  5. 14 Djibouti 95.83 compare
  6. 15 Norway 95.36 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Singapore

All data for Singapore →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Singapore?
Paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Singapore was 97.68 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Singapore?
The highest recorded value was 100 in 2005.
What is the lowest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Singapore?
The lowest recorded value was 94.36 in 2009.
How does Singapore rank for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Singapore ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score rising or falling in Singapore?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Singapore data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-hours-per-year-score/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-hours-per-year-score/singapore/">Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Singapore</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,794 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.