Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan

Japan: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score was 87.71 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
87.71
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
38th
of 191 countries
All-time high
87.71
in 2016
All-time low
71.79
in 2008
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan, 2005–2019

0204060802005201220192005: 782006: 72.62007: 72.62008: 71.82009: 71.82010: 732011: 76.92012: 76.92013: 76.92014: 76.92015: 79.52016: 87.72017: 87.72018: 87.72019: 87.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Japan stood at 87.71. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of up 22.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Japan peaked at 87.71 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 71.79, in 2008.

Japan ranks 38th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 77.98 —
2006 72.57 -6.9%
2007 72.57 +0.0%
2008 71.79 -1.1%
2009 71.79 +0.0%
2010 73.03 +1.7%
2011 76.89 +5.3%
2012 76.89 +0.0%
2013 76.89 +0.0%
2014 76.89 +0.0%
2015 79.52 +3.4%
2016 87.71 +10.3%
2017 87.71 +0.0%
2018 87.71 +0.0%
2019 87.71 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 87.71 is above the median for high income countries, which is 85.7, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 87.71 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 81.38, 1.1× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 73.34 71.79 77.98 5
2010s 81.1 73.03 87.71 10

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 35 Eswatini 88.72 compare
  2. 35 Sweden 88.72 compare
  3. 37 Micronesia (country) 87.79 compare
  4. 39 Sri Lanka 87.64 compare
  5. 40 Austria 87.33 compare
  6. 40 Canada 87.33 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Japan?
Paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score in Japan was 87.71 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 87.71 in 2016.
What is the lowest paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 71.79 in 2008.
How does Japan rank for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Japan ranks 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-hours-per-year-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-hours-per-year-score/japan/">Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,794 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.