Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg

Luxembourg: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 83.75 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
83.75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
52nd
of 183 countries
All-time high
84
in 2015
All-time low
83.75
in 2016
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg, 2015–2019

0204060802015201720192015: 842016: 83.82017: 83.82018: 83.82019: 83.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Luxembourg is 83.75, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% over five years.

That places Luxembourg 52nd out of 183 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg, year by year

Annual values for Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 84 —
2016 83.75 -0.3%
2017 83.75 +0.0%
2018 83.75 +0.0%
2019 83.75 +0.0%

Luxembourg compared with similar countries

  • Luxembourg's 83.75 is above the median for high income countries, which is 83.6, 1.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Luxembourg's 83.75 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 83.45, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Luxembourg

  1. 49 Oman 85.32 compare
  2. 50 Belize 85.09 compare
  3. 51 Azerbaijan 83.79 compare
  4. 53 Belgium 83.45 compare
  5. 54 Switzerland 83.21 compare
  6. 55 Eswatini 83.15 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Luxembourg

All data for Luxembourg →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Luxembourg?
Paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Luxembourg was 83.75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Luxembourg?
The highest recorded value was 84 in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Luxembourg?
The lowest recorded value was 83.75 in 2016.
How does Luxembourg rank for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Luxembourg ranks 52nd out of 183 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Luxembourg data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-postfiling-index-0-100-db17-20-methodology-score/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-postfiling-index-0-100-db17-20-methodology-score/luxembourg/">Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Luxembourg</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 915 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.