What is the highest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?

The highest recorded value was 5.13 in 2015.

What is the lowest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?

The lowest recorded value was 5.13 in 2015.

How does Central African Republic rank for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?

Central African Republic ranks 176th out of 180 countries with data for 2019.

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic

Name: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Central African Republic: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 5.13 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

5.13

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

176th

of 180 countries

All-time high

5.13

in 2015

All-time low

5.13

in 2015

Years of data

2015–2019

Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic, 2015–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic is 5.13, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Central African Republic ranks 176th of 180 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Central African Republic

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More reference data data for Central African Republic

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 4,076 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1959 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.8611 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 308.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 4,492 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 174.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 190.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0271 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 5.92 (2050)

All data for Central African Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic?: Paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score in Central African Republic was 5.13 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?: The highest recorded value was 5.13 in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?: The lowest recorded value was 5.13 in 2015.
How does Central African Republic rank for paying taxes: postfiling index (0-100) (db17-20 methodology) - score?: Central African Republic ranks 176th out of 180 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Central African Republic data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Paying taxes: Postfiling index (0-100) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 182 places, 910 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for postfiling index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.