Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Rwanda
Rwanda: Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score was 90 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Rwanda, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded 90 for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 42.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Rwanda peaked at 90 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 56.67, in 2016.
Rwanda ranks 40th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 63.33 | — |
| 2006 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 76.67 | +21.1% |
| 2012 | 76.67 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 63.33 | -17.4% |
| 2014 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 63.33 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 56.67 | -10.5% |
| 2017 | 90 | +58.8% |
| 2018 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 90 is above the median for low income countries, which is 45, 2.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 90 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 46.67, 1.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.33 | 63.33 | 63.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 73.33 | 56.67 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 40 Russia 90 compare
- 40 Argentina 90 compare
- 40 Azerbaijan 90 compare
- 40 France 90 compare
- 40 Germany 90 compare
- 40 Ireland 90 compare
- 40 Jordan 90 compare
- 40 Malaysia 90 compare
- 40 Marshall Islands 90 compare
- 40 Netherlands 90 compare
- 40 Spain 90 compare
- 40 United Kingdom 90 compare
- 40 Uzbekistan 90 compare
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Rwanda?
- Paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score in Rwanda was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2017.
- What is the lowest paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 56.67 in 2016.
- How does Rwanda rank for paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score?
- Rwanda ranks 40th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is paying taxes: payments per year (number per year) - score rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 42.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Payments per year (number per year) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for tax payments benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.