Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania
Lithuania: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure was 22.6% in 2017. ▲ Rising
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania, 2010–2017
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania is 22.6%, measured in 2017. That is the highest value across all 7 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.0% on the previous year and up 36.0% over ten years.
That places Lithuania 7th out of 65 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top 10%.
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 16.6% | — |
| 2011 | 16.8% | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 16.7% | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | +8.4% |
| 2015 | 17.8% | -2.1% |
| 2016 | 20.5% | +15.4% |
| 2017 | 22.6% | +10.0% |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania?
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Lithuania was 22.6% in 2017, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 22.6% in 2017.
- What is the lowest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.6% in 2010.
- How does Lithuania rank for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Lithuania ranks 7th out of 65 countries with data for 2017.
- Is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/