Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi
Burundi: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure was 6.5% in 2012. ▼ Falling
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi, 2008–2012
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2012, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi stood at 6.5%.
That represents a change of down 0.2% on the previous year and down 21.6% over five years.
Burundi ranks 43rd of 56 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 8.3% | — |
| 2009 | 6.3% | -23.9% |
| 2010 | 8.6% | +35.7% |
| 2011 | 6.5% | -23.9% |
| 2012 | 6.5% | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.3% | 6.3% | 8.3% | 2 |
| 2010s | 7.2% | 6.5% | 8.6% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 40 Sierra Leone 8.6%
- 41 Cyprus 8.0% compare
- 42 Lao People's Democratic Republic 6.6%
- 44 Nepal 6.3%
- 45 Ireland 6.3% compare
- 46 Uganda 5.9%
More reference data data for Burundi
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0676 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5075 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6676 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0521 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6676 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2266 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2677 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2838 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi?
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Burundi was 6.5% in 2012, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 8.6% in 2010.
- What is the lowest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.3% in 2009.
- How does Burundi rank for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Burundi ranks 43rd out of 56 countries with data for 2012.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/