Natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore
Singapore: Natural resource rents, per square kilometre was 0 units per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Singapore recorded 0 units per square kilometre for natural resource rents, per square kilometre in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.3% on the previous year and down 99.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore peaked at 0.0002 units per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 2019.
Singapore ranks 179th of 210 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 units per square kilometre | -39.9% |
| 1972 | 0 units per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1973 | 0 units per square kilometre | +135.7% |
| 1974 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1975 | 0 units per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1976 | 0 units per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1977 | 0 units per square kilometre | -54.9% |
| 1978 | 0 units per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1979 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1980 | 0 units per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1981 | 0 units per square kilometre | -56.3% |
| 1982 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1983 | 0 units per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1984 | 0 units per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 1985 | 0 units per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1986 | 0 units per square kilometre | +68.6% |
| 1987 | 0 units per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1988 | 0 units per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1989 | 0 units per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1990 | 0 units per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1991 | 0 units per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1992 | 0 units per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1993 | 0 units per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 1994 | 0 units per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1995 | 0 units per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1996 | 0 units per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1997 | 0 units per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1998 | 0 units per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 0 units per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 2000 | 0 units per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2001 | 0 units per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2002 | 0 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2003 | 0 units per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 2004 | 0 units per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2005 | 0 units per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0 units per square kilometre | +563.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per square kilometre | +87.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per square kilometre | +267.7% |
| 2009 | 0 units per square kilometre | -73.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | +466.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | +299.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2015 | 0 units per square kilometre | -67.2% |
| 2016 | 0 units per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 2017 | 0 units per square kilometre | -98.5% |
| 2018 | 0 units per square kilometre | -58.4% |
| 2019 | 0 units per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2020 | 0 units per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 2021 | 0 units per square kilometre | -25.3% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 14% of the median. (82 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 0 units per square kilometre is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 units per square kilometre, 4% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +563.5% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
| 2010 | +466.0% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre |
| 2011 | +299.5% | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre |
| 2008 | +267.7% | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0.0002 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 0 units per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More reference data data for Singapore
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0066 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0096 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0378 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2664 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (1992)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2567 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore?
- Natural resource rents, per square kilometre in Singapore was 0 units per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest natural resource rents, per square kilometre recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 units per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest natural resource rents, per square kilometre recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 2019.
- How does Singapore rank for natural resource rents, per square kilometre?
- Singapore ranks 179th out of 210 countries with data for 2021.
- Is natural resource rents, per square kilometre rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Natural resource rents, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Natural resource rents divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Natural resource rents ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Natural resource rents Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Natural resource rents divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.