Multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico
Mexico: Multi-party elections, gaps filled was 1 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico, 1842–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
The most recent figure for multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico is 1, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 126 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico peaked at 1 in 1842 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1924.
Mexico ranks 1st of 172 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1842 | 1 | — |
| 1843 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1925 | 0 | — |
| 1926 | 0 | — |
| 1927 | 0 | — |
| 1928 | 0 | — |
| 1929 | 0 | — |
| 1930 | 0 | — |
| 1931 | 0 | — |
| 1932 | 0 | — |
| 1933 | 0 | — |
| 1934 | 0 | — |
| 1935 | 0 | — |
| 1936 | 0 | — |
| 1937 | 0 | — |
| 1938 | 0 | — |
| 1939 | 0 | — |
| 1940 | 0 | — |
| 1941 | 0 | — |
| 1942 | 0 | — |
| 1943 | 0 | — |
| 1944 | 0 | — |
| 1945 | 0 | — |
| 1946 | 0 | — |
| 1947 | 0 | — |
| 1948 | 0 | — |
| 1949 | 0 | — |
| 1950 | 0 | — |
| 1951 | 0 | — |
| 1952 | 1 | — |
| 1953 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1 | +0.0% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 1 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 1 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| 1850s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1920s | 0.4 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 1 Afghanistan 1 compare
- 1 Angola 1 compare
- 1 Albania 1 compare
- 1 Argentina 1 compare
- 1 Armenia 1 compare
- 1 Australia 1 compare
- 1 Austria 1 compare
- 1 Burundi 1 compare
- 1 Belgium 1 compare
- 1 Benin 1 compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 1 compare
- 1 Bangladesh 1 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 1 compare
- 1 Bahrain 1 compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 1 Bolivia 1 compare
- 1 Brazil 1 compare
- 1 Barbados 1 compare
- 1 Bhutan 1 compare
- 1 Botswana 1 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 1 compare
- 1 Canada 1 compare
- 1 Switzerland 1 compare
- 1 Chile 1 compare
- 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 compare
- 1 Cameroon 1 compare
- 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 1 Congo 1 compare
- 1 Colombia 1 compare
- 1 Comoros 1 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 1 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 1 compare
- 1 Cyprus 1 compare
- 1 Czechia 1 compare
- 1 Germany 1 compare
- 1 Djibouti 1 compare
- 1 Denmark 1 compare
- 1 Dominican Republic 1 compare
- 1 Algeria 1 compare
- 1 Ecuador 1 compare
- 1 Spain 1 compare
- 1 Estonia 1 compare
- 1 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 1 Finland 1 compare
- 1 Fiji 1 compare
- 1 France 1 compare
- 1 Gabon 1 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 1 compare
- 1 Georgia 1 compare
- 1 Ghana 1 compare
- 1 Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Gambia 1 compare
- 1 Guinea-Bissau 1 compare
- 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Greece 1 compare
- 1 Guatemala 1 compare
- 1 Guyana 1 compare
- 1 Honduras 1 compare
- 1 Croatia 1 compare
- 1 Haiti 1 compare
- 1 Hungary 1 compare
- 1 Indonesia 1 compare
- 1 India 1 compare
- 1 Ireland 1 compare
- 1 Iraq 1 compare
- 1 Iceland 1 compare
- 1 Israel 1 compare
- 1 Italy 1 compare
- 1 Jamaica 1 compare
- 1 Jordan 1 compare
- 1 Japan 1 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 1 Kenya 1 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 compare
- 1 Cambodia 1 compare
- 1 South Korea 1 compare
- 1 Kuwait 1 compare
- 1 Lebanon 1 compare
- 1 Liberia 1 compare
- 1 Libya 1 compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 1 compare
- 1 Lesotho 1 compare
- 1 Lithuania 1 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 1 compare
- 1 Latvia 1 compare
- 1 Morocco 1 compare
- 1 Moldova 1 compare
- 1 Madagascar 1 compare
- 1 Maldives 1 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 1 compare
- 1 Mali 1 compare
- 1 Malta 1 compare
- 1 Myanmar 1 compare
- 1 Montenegro 1 compare
- 1 Mongolia 1 compare
- 1 Mozambique 1 compare
- 1 Mauritania 1 compare
- 1 Mauritius 1 compare
- 1 Malawi 1 compare
- 1 Malaysia 1 compare
- 1 Namibia 1 compare
- 1 Niger 1 compare
- 1 Nigeria 1 compare
- 1 Netherlands 1 compare
- 1 Norway 1 compare
- 1 Nepal 1 compare
- 1 New Zealand 1 compare
- 1 Pakistan 1 compare
- 1 Panama 1 compare
- 1 Peru 1 compare
- 1 Philippines 1 compare
- 1 Papua New Guinea 1 compare
- 1 Poland 1 compare
- 1 Portugal 1 compare
- 1 Paraguay 1 compare
- 1 Romania 1 compare
- 1 Russia 1 compare
- 1 Rwanda 1 compare
- 1 Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Senegal 1 compare
- 1 Singapore 1 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 1 compare
- 1 Sierra Leone 1 compare
- 1 El Salvador 1 compare
- 1 Serbia 1 compare
- 1 South Sudan 1 compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 compare
- 1 Suriname 1 compare
- 1 Slovakia 1 compare
- 1 Slovenia 1 compare
- 1 Sweden 1 compare
- 1 Seychelles 1 compare
- 1 Chad 1 compare
- 1 Togo 1 compare
- 1 Thailand 1 compare
- 1 East Timor 1 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 1 compare
- 1 Tunisia 1 compare
- 1 Turkey 1 compare
- 1 Tanzania 1 compare
- 1 Uganda 1 compare
- 1 Ukraine 1 compare
- 1 Uruguay 1 compare
- 1 United States 1 compare
- 1 Vanuatu 1 compare
- 1 South Africa 1 compare
- 1 Zambia 1 compare
- 1 Zimbabwe 1 compare
- 1 Taiwan 1 compare
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico?
- Multi-party elections, gaps filled in Mexico was 1 in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest multi-party elections, gaps filled recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 1842.
- What is the lowest multi-party elections, gaps filled recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1924.
- How does Mexico rank for multi-party elections, gaps filled?
- Mexico ranks 1st out of 172 countries with data for 2025.
- Is multi-party elections, gaps filled rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Multi-party elections, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 126 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Multi-party elections V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Multi-party elections with 279 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.