Judicial Checks on Government Index in Latvia
Latvia: Judicial Checks on Government Index was 0.942 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Judicial Checks on Government Index in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for judicial checks on government index in Latvia is 0.942, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 1.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial checks on government index in Latvia peaked at 0.963 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.023, in 1918.
Latvia ranks 20th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Judicial Checks on Government Index in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.126 | — |
| 1790 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.126 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.223 | +77.0% |
| 1856 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.223 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.658 | +195.1% |
| 1865 | 0.747 | +13.5% |
| 1866 | 0.858 | +14.9% |
| 1867 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.412 | -52.0% |
| 1879 | 0.412 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.412 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.239 | -42.0% |
| 1882 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.239 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.271 | +13.4% |
| 1886 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.163 | -39.9% |
| 1901 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.163 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.166 | +1.8% |
| 1907 | 0.167 | +0.6% |
| 1908 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.177 | +6.0% |
| 1910 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.177 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.169 | -4.5% |
| 1915 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.168 | -0.6% |
| 1917 | 0.163 | -3.0% |
| 1918 | 0.023 | -85.9% |
| 1919 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.868 | +3673.9% |
| 1921 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.778 | -10.4% |
| 1935 | 0.736 | -5.4% |
| 1936 | 0.723 | -1.8% |
| 1937 | 0.723 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.723 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.723 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.023 | -96.8% |
| 1941 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.027 | +17.4% |
| 1955 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.027 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.047 | +74.1% |
| 1988 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.048 | +2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.857 | +1685.4% |
| 1991 | 0.857 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.857 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.862 | +0.6% |
| 1994 | 0.862 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.867 | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 0.917 | +5.8% |
| 1997 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.917 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.925 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 0.934 | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.934 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.934 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.937 | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 0.955 | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.953 | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.953 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.953 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.953 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.963 | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.962 | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 0.943 | -2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.925 | -1.9% |
| 2024 | 0.942 | +1.8% |
| 2025 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.942 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.872, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.942 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.802, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.126 | 0.126 | 0.126 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.1745 | 0.126 | 0.223 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.5729 | 0.223 | 0.858 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.7688 | 0.412 | 0.858 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.2723 | 0.239 | 0.412 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.271 | 0.271 | 0.271 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.1655 | 0.163 | 0.177 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.1423 | 0.023 | 0.177 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.868 | 0.868 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.7878 | 0.723 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0254 | 0.023 | 0.027 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.027 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0331 | 0.027 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.883 | 0.857 | 0.917 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9195 | 0.917 | 0.934 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9498 | 0.934 | 0.963 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9462 | 0.925 | 0.963 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial checks on government index in Latvia?
- Judicial checks on government index in Latvia was 0.942 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial checks on government index recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.963 in 2018.
- What is the lowest judicial checks on government index recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.023 in 1918.
- How does Latvia rank for judicial checks on government index?
- Latvia ranks 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial checks on government index rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Checks on Government Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive respects the constitution, complies with the judiciary and high courts, and higher and lower courts are independent.