Judicial Checks on Government Index in Cuba
Cuba: Judicial Checks on Government Index was 0.089 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Judicial Checks on Government Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.089 for judicial checks on government index in 2025.
The figure is down 1.1% on the previous year and down 14.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, judicial checks on government index in Cuba peaked at 0.519 in 1940 and was at its lowest, 0.083, in 1960.
Cuba ranks 158th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Judicial Checks on Government Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.245 | — |
| 1790 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.245 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.29 | +18.4% |
| 1899 | 0.265 | -8.6% |
| 1900 | 0.489 | +84.5% |
| 1901 | 0.489 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.517 | +5.7% |
| 1903 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.511 | -1.2% |
| 1907 | 0.511 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.511 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.511 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.518 | +1.4% |
| 1911 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.443 | -14.5% |
| 1929 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.434 | -2.0% |
| 1932 | 0.434 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.422 | -2.8% |
| 1934 | 0.487 | +15.4% |
| 1935 | 0.487 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.487 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.487 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.487 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.487 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.519 | +6.6% |
| 1941 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.519 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.486 | -6.4% |
| 1952 | 0.435 | -10.5% |
| 1953 | 0.361 | -17.0% |
| 1954 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.361 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.096 | -73.4% |
| 1960 | 0.083 | -13.5% |
| 1961 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.083 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.093 | +12.0% |
| 1977 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.109 | +17.2% |
| 2014 | 0.104 | -4.6% |
| 2015 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.104 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.098 | -5.8% |
| 2024 | 0.09 | -8.2% |
| 2025 | 0.089 | -1.1% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.089 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.624, 14% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.089 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.694, 13% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.245 | 0.245 | 0.245 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2515 | 0.245 | 0.29 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.509 | 0.489 | 0.517 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.518 | 0.518 | 0.518 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.503 | 0.443 | 0.518 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.4655 | 0.422 | 0.487 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.519 | 0.519 | 0.519 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3702 | 0.096 | 0.519 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.083 | 0.083 | 0.083 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.087 | 0.083 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.093 | 0.093 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.093 | 0.093 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.093 | 0.093 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1012 | 0.093 | 0.109 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0982 | 0.089 | 0.104 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is judicial checks on government index in Cuba?
- Judicial checks on government index in Cuba was 0.089 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest judicial checks on government index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.519 in 1940.
- What is the lowest judicial checks on government index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.083 in 1960.
- How does Cuba rank for judicial checks on government index?
- Cuba ranks 158th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is judicial checks on government index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Judicial Checks on Government Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive respects the constitution, complies with the judiciary and high courts, and higher and lower courts are independent.