Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba
Cuba: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled was 1.7 in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba, 1995–2018
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
Cuba recorded 1.7 for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in 2018.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba peaked at 8.3 in 1995 and was at its lowest, 1.58, in 2008.
That places Cuba 170th out of 185 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 8.3 | — |
| 1996 | 7.6 | -8.4% |
| 1997 | 7.1 | -6.6% |
| 1998 | 6.2 | -12.7% |
| 1999 | 6.3 | +1.6% |
| 2000 | 5.45 | -13.5% |
| 2001 | 4.08 | -25.1% |
| 2002 | 3.31 | -18.8% |
| 2003 | 2.33 | -29.8% |
| 2004 | 1.85 | -20.3% |
| 2005 | 1.95 | +5.2% |
| 2006 | 1.91 | -1.9% |
| 2007 | 1.79 | -6.5% |
| 2008 | 1.58 | -11.5% |
| 2009 | 1.67 | +5.5% |
| 2010 | 2.5 | +49.7% |
| 2011 | 3.17 | +27.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 | +10.2% |
| 2013 | 3.29 | -6.0% |
| 2014 | 2.7 | -17.9% |
| 2015 | 2.4 | -11.1% |
| 2016 | 2 | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 1.7 | -15.0% |
| 2018 | 1.7 | +0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 1.7 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5.82, 29% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 1.7 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 6.34, 27% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.1 | 6.2 | 8.3 | 5 |
| 2000s | 2.59 | 1.58 | 5.45 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.55 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba?
- Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled in Cuba was 1.7 in 2018, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 8.3 in 1995.
- What is the lowest ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.58 in 2008.
- How does Cuba rank for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 170th out of 185 countries with data for 2018.
- Is ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Ilo national vs modeled data Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.