Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba
Cuba: Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate was 0 % change on previous year in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba, 1996–2018
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0 % change on previous year for ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in 2018.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% on the previous year and up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba peaked at 49.7 % change on previous year in 2010 and was at its lowest, -29.78 % change on previous year, in 2003.
That places Cuba 61st out of 140 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -8.43 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | -6.58 % change on previous year | -22.0% |
| 1998 | -12.68 % change on previous year | +92.7% |
| 1999 | 1.61 % change on previous year | -112.7% |
| 2000 | -13.54 % change on previous year | -939.5% |
| 2001 | -25.11 % change on previous year | +85.5% |
| 2002 | -18.83 % change on previous year | -25.0% |
| 2003 | -29.78 % change on previous year | +58.2% |
| 2004 | -20.26 % change on previous year | -32.0% |
| 2005 | 5.18 % change on previous year | -125.6% |
| 2006 | -1.9 % change on previous year | -136.6% |
| 2007 | -6.53 % change on previous year | +244.4% |
| 2008 | -11.47 % change on previous year | +75.5% |
| 2009 | 5.5 % change on previous year | -147.9% |
| 2010 | 49.7 % change on previous year | +804.3% |
| 2011 | 27 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 2012 | 10.17 % change on previous year | -62.3% |
| 2013 | -6 % change on previous year | -159.0% |
| 2014 | -17.88 % change on previous year | +197.9% |
| 2015 | -11.11 % change on previous year | -37.9% |
| 2016 | -16.67 % change on previous year | +50.0% |
| 2017 | -15 % change on previous year | -10.0% |
| 2018 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0 % change on previous year is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -6.06 % change on previous year. (44 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0 % change on previous year is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -4.02 % change on previous year. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -939.5% | 1.61 % change on previous year | -13.54 % change on previous year |
| 2010 | +804.3% | 5.5 % change on previous year | 49.7 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6.52 % change on previous year | -12.68 % change on previous year | 1.61 % change on previous year | 4 |
| 2000s | -11.67 % change on previous year | -29.78 % change on previous year | 5.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.25 % change on previous year | -17.88 % change on previous year | 49.7 % change on previous year | 9 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba?
- Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate in Cuba was 0 % change on previous year in 2018, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 49.7 % change on previous year in 2010.
- What is the lowest ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -29.78 % change on previous year in 2003.
- How does Cuba rank for ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 61st out of 140 countries with data for 2018.
- Is ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Ilo national vs modeled data, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Ilo national vs modeled data. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Ilo national vs modeled data Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Ilo national vs modeled data. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.