History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador
Ecuador: History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale was 10,639 2011 US$ in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2018)
10,639 2011 US$
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
87th
of 145 countries
All-time high
11,036 2011 US$
in 2014
All-time low
760 2011 US$
in 1870
Years of data
122
1870–2018
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador, 1870–2018
Source: Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in 2011 US$.
Analysis
In 2018, history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador stood at 10,639 2011 US$.
That represents a change of up 16.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador peaked at 11,036 2011 US$ in 2014 and was at its lowest, 760 2011 US$, in 1870.
That places Ecuador 87th out of 145 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 2011 US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1870 | 760 2011 US$ | — |
| 1880 | 760 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 893 2011 US$ | +17.5% |
| 1900 | 1,098 2011 US$ | +23.0% |
| 1901 | 1,121 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 1,143 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1903 | 1,165 2011 US$ | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 1,189 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 1905 | 1,213 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1906 | 1,237 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1907 | 1,261 2011 US$ | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 1,299 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1909 | 1,337 2011 US$ | +2.9% |
| 1910 | 1,379 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 1911 | 1,420 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1912 | 1,462 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1913 | 1,506 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1914 | 1,537 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 1915 | 1,567 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1916 | 1,583 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1917 | 1,599 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1918 | 1,615 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1919 | 1,647 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1920 | 1,680 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1921 | 1,696 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1922 | 1,714 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1923 | 1,731 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1924 | 1,749 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1925 | 1,765 2011 US$ | +0.9% |
| 1926 | 1,784 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1927 | 1,836 2011 US$ | +2.9% |
| 1928 | 1,892 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 1929 | 1,948 2011 US$ | +3.0% |
| 1930 | 1,969 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1931 | 1,929 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1932 | 1,890 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1933 | 1,890 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 1,890 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1,890 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1,908 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1937 | 1,927 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1938 | 1,948 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1939 | 1,967 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1940 | 2,050 2011 US$ | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 2,016 2011 US$ | -1.7% |
| 1942 | 2,056 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1943 | 2,259 2011 US$ | +9.9% |
| 1944 | 2,230 2011 US$ | -1.3% |
| 1945 | 2,182 2011 US$ | -2.2% |
| 1946 | 2,381 2011 US$ | +9.1% |
| 1947 | 2,571 2011 US$ | +8.0% |
| 1948 | 2,844 2011 US$ | +10.6% |
| 1949 | 2,815 2011 US$ | -1.0% |
| 1950 | 2,970 2011 US$ | +5.5% |
| 1951 | 2,925 2011 US$ | -1.5% |
| 1952 | 3,202 2011 US$ | +9.5% |
| 1953 | 3,185 2011 US$ | -0.5% |
| 1954 | 3,352 2011 US$ | +5.2% |
| 1955 | 3,349 2011 US$ | -0.1% |
| 1956 | 3,381 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 1957 | 3,437 2011 US$ | +1.7% |
| 1958 | 3,441 2011 US$ | +0.1% |
| 1959 | 3,524 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1960 | 3,649 2011 US$ | +3.5% |
| 1961 | 3,633 2011 US$ | -0.4% |
| 1962 | 3,716 2011 US$ | +2.3% |
| 1963 | 3,698 2011 US$ | -0.5% |
| 1964 | 3,843 2011 US$ | +3.9% |
| 1965 | 4,090 2011 US$ | +6.4% |
| 1966 | 4,074 2011 US$ | -0.4% |
| 1967 | 4,163 2011 US$ | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 4,264 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1969 | 4,366 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1970 | 4,535 2011 US$ | +3.9% |
| 1971 | 4,658 2011 US$ | +2.7% |
| 1972 | 4,801 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 5,244 2011 US$ | +9.2% |
| 1974 | 5,392 2011 US$ | +2.8% |
| 1975 | 5,514 2011 US$ | +2.3% |
| 1976 | 5,877 2011 US$ | +6.6% |
| 1977 | 6,073 2011 US$ | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 6,314 2011 US$ | +4.0% |
| 1979 | 6,472 2011 US$ | +2.5% |
| 1980 | 6,582 2011 US$ | +1.7% |
| 1981 | 6,664 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 6,558 2011 US$ | -1.6% |
| 1983 | 6,252 2011 US$ | -4.7% |
| 1984 | 6,336 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
| 1985 | 6,433 2011 US$ | +1.5% |
| 1986 | 6,452 2011 US$ | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 5,893 2011 US$ | -8.7% |
| 1988 | 6,357 2011 US$ | +7.9% |
| 1989 | 6,207 2011 US$ | -2.4% |
| 1990 | 6,221 2011 US$ | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 6,513 2011 US$ | +4.7% |
| 1992 | 6,715 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 6,770 2011 US$ | +0.8% |
| 1994 | 6,940 2011 US$ | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 6,985 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 6,994 2011 US$ | +0.1% |
| 1997 | 7,181 2011 US$ | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 7,307 2011 US$ | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 6,885 2011 US$ | -5.8% |
| 2000 | 6,908 2011 US$ | +0.3% |
| 2001 | 7,131 2011 US$ | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 7,360 2011 US$ | +3.2% |
| 2003 | 7,468 2011 US$ | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 7,959 2011 US$ | +6.6% |
| 2005 | 8,257 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 2006 | 8,522 2011 US$ | +3.2% |
| 2007 | 8,634 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 9,104 2011 US$ | +5.4% |
| 2009 | 9,081 2011 US$ | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 9,327 2011 US$ | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 9,985 2011 US$ | +7.1% |
| 2012 | 10,398 2011 US$ | +4.1% |
| 2013 | 10,760 2011 US$ | +3.5% |
| 2014 | 11,036 2011 US$ | +2.6% |
| 2015 | 10,905 2011 US$ | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 10,527 2011 US$ | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 10,637 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 10,639 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 760 2011 US$ | 760 2011 US$ | 760 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1880s | 760 2011 US$ | 760 2011 US$ | 760 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1890s | 893 2011 US$ | 893 2011 US$ | 893 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1900s | 1,206 2011 US$ | 1,098 2011 US$ | 1,337 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1910s | 1,532 2011 US$ | 1,379 2011 US$ | 1,647 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1920s | 1,780 2011 US$ | 1,680 2011 US$ | 1,948 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1930s | 1,921 2011 US$ | 1,890 2011 US$ | 1,969 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1940s | 2,340 2011 US$ | 2,016 2011 US$ | 2,844 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1950s | 3,277 2011 US$ | 2,925 2011 US$ | 3,524 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1960s | 3,950 2011 US$ | 3,633 2011 US$ | 4,366 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 5,488 2011 US$ | 4,535 2011 US$ | 6,472 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 6,373 2011 US$ | 5,893 2011 US$ | 6,664 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 6,851 2011 US$ | 6,221 2011 US$ | 7,307 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 8,042 2011 US$ | 6,908 2011 US$ | 9,104 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 10,468 2011 US$ | 9,327 2011 US$ | 11,036 2011 US$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 84 Tunisia 11,354 2011 US$ compare
- 85 Uzbekistan 11,220 2011 US$ compare
- 86 Albania 11,104 2011 US$ compare
- 88 Saint Lucia 10,475 2011 US$ compare
- 89 Bosnia and Herzegovina 10,460 2011 US$ compare
- 90 Ukraine 9,813 2011 US$ compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador?
- History’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Ecuador was 10,639 2011 US$ in 2018, according to Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 11,036 2011 US$ in 2014.
- What is the lowest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 760 2011 US$ in 1870.
- How does Ecuador rank for history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale?
- Ecuador ranks 87th out of 145 countries with data for 2018.
- Is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Unit 1 'The capitalist revolution’ Section 1.3 'History's Hockey Stick: Growth in income' in The CORE Team, The Economy. Available at: https://tinyco.re/28126370 [Figure 1.1b]