History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil
Brazil: History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale was 14,034 2011 US$ in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2018)
14,034 2011 US$
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
69th
of 145 countries
All-time high
15,826 2011 US$
in 2015
All-time low
818 2011 US$
in 1854
Years of data
171
1800–2018
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil, 1800–2018
Source: Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in 2011 US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil is 14,034 2011 US$, measured in 2018.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil peaked at 15,826 2011 US$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 818 2011 US$, in 1854.
That places Brazil 69th out of 145 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil, year by year
| Year | 2011 US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1800 | 867 2011 US$ | — |
| 1820 | 867 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 867 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 926 2011 US$ | +6.8% |
| 1852 | 901 2011 US$ | -2.7% |
| 1853 | 846 2011 US$ | -6.1% |
| 1854 | 818 2011 US$ | -3.3% |
| 1855 | 824 2011 US$ | +0.7% |
| 1856 | 854 2011 US$ | +3.6% |
| 1857 | 915 2011 US$ | +7.1% |
| 1858 | 974 2011 US$ | +6.4% |
| 1859 | 966 2011 US$ | -0.8% |
| 1860 | 991 2011 US$ | +2.6% |
| 1861 | 982 2011 US$ | -0.9% |
| 1862 | 936 2011 US$ | -4.7% |
| 1863 | 956 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 1864 | 971 2011 US$ | +1.6% |
| 1865 | 1,042 2011 US$ | +7.3% |
| 1866 | 1,081 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 1867 | 1,170 2011 US$ | +8.2% |
| 1868 | 1,170 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 1,170 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1,084 2011 US$ | -7.4% |
| 1871 | 1,084 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1,122 2011 US$ | +3.5% |
| 1873 | 1,089 2011 US$ | -2.9% |
| 1874 | 1,106 2011 US$ | +1.6% |
| 1875 | 1,122 2011 US$ | +1.4% |
| 1876 | 1,081 2011 US$ | -3.7% |
| 1877 | 1,050 2011 US$ | -2.9% |
| 1878 | 1,101 2011 US$ | +4.9% |
| 1879 | 1,109 2011 US$ | +0.7% |
| 1880 | 1,058 2011 US$ | -4.6% |
| 1881 | 1,068 2011 US$ | +0.9% |
| 1882 | 1,093 2011 US$ | +2.3% |
| 1883 | 1,063 2011 US$ | -2.7% |
| 1884 | 1,135 2011 US$ | +6.8% |
| 1885 | 1,055 2011 US$ | -7.0% |
| 1886 | 1,089 2011 US$ | +3.2% |
| 1887 | 1,017 2011 US$ | -6.6% |
| 1888 | 977 2011 US$ | -3.9% |
| 1889 | 991 2011 US$ | +1.4% |
| 1890 | 1,084 2011 US$ | +9.4% |
| 1891 | 1,152 2011 US$ | +6.3% |
| 1892 | 999 2011 US$ | -13.3% |
| 1893 | 850 2011 US$ | -14.9% |
| 1894 | 850 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 1,007 2011 US$ | +18.5% |
| 1896 | 915 2011 US$ | -9.1% |
| 1897 | 901 2011 US$ | -1.5% |
| 1898 | 923 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1899 | 905 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1900 | 874 2011 US$ | -3.4% |
| 1901 | 940 2011 US$ | +7.6% |
| 1902 | 921 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1903 | 920 2011 US$ | -0.1% |
| 1904 | 918 2011 US$ | -0.2% |
| 1905 | 925 2011 US$ | +0.8% |
| 1906 | 993 2011 US$ | +7.4% |
| 1907 | 972 2011 US$ | -2.1% |
| 1908 | 945 2011 US$ | -2.8% |
| 1909 | 999 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 1910 | 990 2011 US$ | -0.9% |
| 1911 | 1,076 2011 US$ | +8.7% |
| 1912 | 1,042 2011 US$ | -3.2% |
| 1913 | 1,046 2011 US$ | +0.4% |
| 1914 | 1,004 2011 US$ | -4.0% |
| 1915 | 1,028 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1916 | 1,036 2011 US$ | +0.8% |
| 1917 | 1,086 2011 US$ | +4.8% |
| 1918 | 1,041 2011 US$ | -4.1% |
| 1919 | 1,154 2011 US$ | +10.9% |
| 1920 | 1,242 2011 US$ | +7.6% |
| 1921 | 1,242 2011 US$ | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1,301 2011 US$ | +4.8% |
| 1923 | 1,347 2011 US$ | +3.5% |
| 1924 | 1,320 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1925 | 1,298 2011 US$ | -1.7% |
| 1926 | 1,299 2011 US$ | +0.1% |
| 1927 | 1,366 2011 US$ | +5.2% |
| 1928 | 1,492 2011 US$ | +9.2% |
| 1929 | 1,465 2011 US$ | -1.8% |
| 1930 | 1,350 2011 US$ | -7.8% |
| 1931 | 1,294 2011 US$ | -4.1% |
| 1932 | 1,312 2011 US$ | +1.4% |
| 1933 | 1,387 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 1934 | 1,471 2011 US$ | +6.1% |
| 1935 | 1,482 2011 US$ | +0.7% |
| 1936 | 1,591 2011 US$ | +7.4% |
| 1937 | 1,610 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 1938 | 1,643 2011 US$ | +2.0% |
| 1939 | 1,627 2011 US$ | -1.0% |
| 1940 | 1,610 2011 US$ | -1.0% |
| 1941 | 1,683 2011 US$ | +4.5% |
| 1942 | 1,584 2011 US$ | -5.9% |
| 1943 | 1,763 2011 US$ | +11.3% |
| 1944 | 1,785 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 1945 | 1,792 2011 US$ | +0.4% |
| 1946 | 1,934 2011 US$ | +7.9% |
| 1947 | 1,956 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 1948 | 2,096 2011 US$ | +7.2% |
| 1949 | 2,204 2011 US$ | +5.2% |
| 1950 | 2,236 2011 US$ | +1.5% |
| 1951 | 2,279 2011 US$ | +1.9% |
| 1952 | 2,377 2011 US$ | +4.3% |
| 1953 | 2,418 2011 US$ | +1.7% |
| 1954 | 2,531 2011 US$ | +4.7% |
| 1955 | 2,675 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 1956 | 2,672 2011 US$ | -0.1% |
| 1957 | 2,793 2011 US$ | +4.5% |
| 1958 | 3,005 2011 US$ | +7.6% |
| 1959 | 3,201 2011 US$ | +6.5% |
| 1960 | 3,398 2011 US$ | +6.2% |
| 1961 | 3,585 2011 US$ | +5.5% |
| 1962 | 3,711 2011 US$ | +3.5% |
| 1963 | 3,623 2011 US$ | -2.4% |
| 1964 | 3,637 2011 US$ | +0.4% |
| 1965 | 3,617 2011 US$ | -0.5% |
| 1966 | 3,747 2011 US$ | +3.6% |
| 1967 | 3,795 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
| 1968 | 4,050 2011 US$ | +6.7% |
| 1969 | 4,313 2011 US$ | +6.5% |
| 1970 | 4,635 2011 US$ | +7.5% |
| 1971 | 5,024 2011 US$ | +8.4% |
| 1972 | 5,480 2011 US$ | +9.1% |
| 1973 | 6,086 2011 US$ | +11.1% |
| 1974 | 6,416 2011 US$ | +5.4% |
| 1975 | 6,582 2011 US$ | +2.6% |
| 1976 | 7,079 2011 US$ | +7.6% |
| 1977 | 7,248 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1978 | 7,425 2011 US$ | +2.4% |
| 1979 | 7,736 2011 US$ | +4.2% |
| 1980 | 8,249 2011 US$ | +6.6% |
| 1981 | 7,709 2011 US$ | -6.5% |
| 1982 | 7,587 2011 US$ | -1.6% |
| 1983 | 7,203 2011 US$ | -5.1% |
| 1984 | 7,438 2011 US$ | +3.3% |
| 1985 | 7,862 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 1986 | 8,281 2011 US$ | +5.3% |
| 1987 | 8,402 2011 US$ | +1.5% |
| 1988 | 8,230 2011 US$ | -2.0% |
| 1989 | 8,333 2011 US$ | +1.3% |
| 1990 | 7,842 2011 US$ | -5.9% |
| 1991 | 7,888 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
| 1992 | 7,813 2011 US$ | -1.0% |
| 1993 | 8,166 2011 US$ | +4.5% |
| 1994 | 8,616 2011 US$ | +5.5% |
| 1995 | 8,952 2011 US$ | +3.9% |
| 1996 | 9,125 2011 US$ | +1.9% |
| 1997 | 9,410 2011 US$ | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 9,419 2011 US$ | +0.1% |
| 1999 | 9,442 2011 US$ | +0.2% |
| 2000 | 9,834 2011 US$ | +4.2% |
| 2001 | 9,953 2011 US$ | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 10,245 2011 US$ | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 10,355 2011 US$ | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 10,950 2011 US$ | +5.7% |
| 2005 | 11,306 2011 US$ | +3.3% |
| 2006 | 11,767 2011 US$ | +4.1% |
| 2007 | 12,500 2011 US$ | +6.2% |
| 2008 | 13,164 2011 US$ | +5.3% |
| 2009 | 13,181 2011 US$ | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 14,216 2011 US$ | +7.8% |
| 2011 | 14,831 2011 US$ | +4.3% |
| 2012 | 14,985 2011 US$ | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 15,306 2011 US$ | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 15,258 2011 US$ | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 15,826 2011 US$ | +3.7% |
| 2016 | 13,873 2011 US$ | -12.3% |
| 2017 | 13,952 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 14,034 2011 US$ | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 867 2011 US$ | 867 2011 US$ | 867 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1820s | 867 2011 US$ | 867 2011 US$ | 867 2011 US$ | 1 |
| 1850s | 889.1 2011 US$ | 818 2011 US$ | 974 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1860s | 1,047 2011 US$ | 936 2011 US$ | 1,170 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1870s | 1,095 2011 US$ | 1,050 2011 US$ | 1,122 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1880s | 1,055 2011 US$ | 977 2011 US$ | 1,135 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1890s | 958.6 2011 US$ | 850 2011 US$ | 1,152 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1900s | 940.7 2011 US$ | 874 2011 US$ | 999 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1910s | 1,050 2011 US$ | 990 2011 US$ | 1,154 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1920s | 1,337 2011 US$ | 1,242 2011 US$ | 1,492 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1930s | 1,477 2011 US$ | 1,294 2011 US$ | 1,643 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1940s | 1,841 2011 US$ | 1,584 2011 US$ | 2,204 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1950s | 2,619 2011 US$ | 2,236 2011 US$ | 3,201 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1960s | 3,748 2011 US$ | 3,398 2011 US$ | 4,313 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 6,371 2011 US$ | 4,635 2011 US$ | 7,736 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 7,929 2011 US$ | 7,203 2011 US$ | 8,402 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 8,667 2011 US$ | 7,813 2011 US$ | 9,442 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 11,325 2011 US$ | 9,834 2011 US$ | 13,181 2011 US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 14,698 2011 US$ | 13,873 2011 US$ | 15,826 2011 US$ | 9 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil?
- History’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale in Brazil was 14,034 2011 US$ in 2018, according to Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 15,826 2011 US$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 818 2011 US$ in 1854.
- How does Brazil rank for history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale?
- Brazil ranks 69th out of 145 countries with data for 2018.
- Is history’s hockey stick: real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Maddison Project Database (2018) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of History’s hockey stick: Real gross domestic product per capita using the ratio scale. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 171 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Unit 1 'The capitalist revolution’ Section 1.3 'History's Hockey Stick: Growth in income' in The CORE Team, The Economy. Available at: https://tinyco.re/28126370 [Figure 1.1b]