Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023. ▼ Falling
Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp in 2023.
The figure is up 14.4% on the previous year and down 42.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2017.
Zimbabwe ranks 96th of 192 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 34 years of available data.
Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +24.2% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +31.8% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +8.6% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.1% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -51.1% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -59.4% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +52.3% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +14.4% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 77% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 0 units per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 55% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | -59.4% | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 (2026)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 0.2726 (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 (2026)
- Country level monthly temperature anomalies -0.5886 (2026)
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Urban area long term, annual growth rate 1.8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban area long term, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban area long term, per capita 0.0002 units per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe?
- Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- What is the lowest hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2017.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp?
- Zimbabwe ranks 96th out of 192 countries with data for 2023.
- Is hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Hdi vs augmented hdi, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Hdi vs augmented hdi divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Hdi vs augmented hdi ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Hdi vs augmented hdi Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Hdi vs augmented hdi divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.