Government transparency in Mali
Mali: Government transparency was -0.6816 in 2010. ▲ Rising
Government transparency in Mali, 1980–2010
Source: Hollyer et al. (2014) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for government transparency in Mali is -0.6816, measured in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.4% on the previous year and down 31.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government transparency in Mali peaked at -0.4783 in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.6912, in 2009.
That places Mali 105th out of 125 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 31 years of available data.
Government transparency in Mali, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | -0.6402 | — |
| 1981 | -0.6566 | +2.6% |
| 1982 | -0.6419 | -2.2% |
| 1983 | -0.6618 | +3.1% |
| 1984 | -0.66 | -0.3% |
| 1985 | -0.6146 | -6.9% |
| 1986 | -0.6084 | -1.0% |
| 1987 | -0.5701 | -6.3% |
| 1988 | -0.6134 | +7.6% |
| 1989 | -0.6672 | +8.8% |
| 1990 | -0.5597 | -16.1% |
| 1991 | -0.6016 | +7.5% |
| 1992 | -0.6016 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.6035 | +0.3% |
| 1994 | -0.6038 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.6072 | +0.6% |
| 1996 | -0.5382 | -11.4% |
| 1997 | -0.5204 | -3.3% |
| 1998 | -0.5161 | -0.8% |
| 1999 | -0.515 | -0.2% |
| 2000 | -0.5194 | +0.9% |
| 2001 | -0.5248 | +1.0% |
| 2002 | -0.5298 | +0.9% |
| 2003 | -0.5596 | +5.6% |
| 2004 | -0.4783 | -14.5% |
| 2005 | -0.5509 | +15.2% |
| 2006 | -0.4864 | -11.7% |
| 2007 | -0.5485 | +12.8% |
| 2008 | -0.6803 | +24.0% |
| 2009 | -0.6912 | +1.6% |
| 2010 | -0.6816 | -1.4% |
Mali compared with similar countries
- Mali's -0.6816 is below the median for low income countries, which is -0.6583, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Mali's -0.6816 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.6006, 1.1× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -0.6334 | -0.6672 | -0.5701 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.5667 | -0.6072 | -0.515 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.5569 | -0.6912 | -0.4783 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.6816 | -0.6816 | -0.6816 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mali
More reference data data for Mali
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3081 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4025 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 39.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.19 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government transparency in Mali?
- Government transparency in Mali was -0.6816 in 2010, according to Hollyer et al. (2014) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest government transparency recorded in Mali?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4783 in 2004.
- What is the lowest government transparency recorded in Mali?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6912 in 2009.
- How does Mali rank for government transparency?
- Mali ranks 105th out of 125 countries with data for 2010.
- Is government transparency rising or falling in Mali?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mali data come from?
- The figures come from Hollyer et al. (2014) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Government transparency. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
The scores capture the extent to which governments report economic data to the World Bank. Higher scores mean more data is reported.